Cited by 29Mind wandering and attentionHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Hemodynamic profiles of functional and dysfunctional forms of repetitive thinking

Open access
Ottaviani, Cristina, Brosschot, Jos F., Lonigro, Antonia, Medea, Barbara, Van Diest, Ilse, Thayer, Julian F.·2017·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability of the human brain to escape the here and now (mind wandering) can take functional (problem solving) and dysfunctional (perseverative cognition) routes. Although it has been proposed that only the latter may act as a mediator of the relationship between stress and cardiovascular disease, both functional and dysfunctional forms of repetitive thinking have been associated with blood pressure (BP) reactivity of the same magnitude. However, a similar BP reactivity may be caused by different physiological determinants, which may differ in their risk for cardiovascular pathology. PURPOSE: To examine the way (hemodynamic profile) and the extent (compensation deficit) to which total peripheral resistance and cardiac output compensate for each other in determining BP reactivity during functional and dysfunctional types of repetitive thinking. METHODS: Fifty-six healthy participants randomly underwent a perseverative cognition, a mind wandering, and a problem solving induction, each followed by a 5-min recovery period while their cardiovascular parameters were continuously monitored. RESULTS: Perseverative cognition and problem solving (but not mind wandering) elicited BP increases of similar magnitude. However, perseverative cognition was characterized by a more vascular (versus myocardial) profile compared to mind wandering and problem solving. As a consequence, BP recovery was impaired after perseverative cognition compared to the other two conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Given that high vascular resistance and delayed recovery are the hallmarks of hypertension the results suggest a potential mechanism through which perseverative cognition may act as a mediator in the relationship between stress and risk for developing precursors to cardiovascular disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12160-016-9851-3

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inducing rumination after a stressor leads to greater vasoconstriction and prolonged blood pressure recovery.

    “Inducing rumination after a stressor leads to greater vasoconstriction and prolonged blood pressure recovery (Ottaviani et al., 2017).”

    From More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science (2018) · cites this paper as Ottaviani et al., 2017

    The Results report greater total peripheral resistance during perseverative-cognition induction and higher blood pressure during the subsequent recovery period than in the comparison conditions. But the Experimental manipulation instructions asked participants to think about a past upsetting event or a future worry; the study did not induce rumination after an experimentally administered stressor. The induction also encompassed worry as well as rumination. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Guyton A. Human physiology and mechanisms of disease (4th ed). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1987.
  2. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE. STAI Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970.
  3. Spielberger CD. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: Bibliography (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1989.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ottaviani, C., Brosschot, J. F., Lonigro, A., Medea, B., Van Diest, I., & Thayer, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Ottaviani, Cristina
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2016-10-28
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
261-271
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W2545119187
Cited by
29
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Iris (Roma Tre University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Ministero della Salute (2011-02348232)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
perseverative cognition, mind wandering, problem solving, blood pressure reactivity, hemodynamic profile, systemic vascular resistance, cardiac output, blood pressure recovery, cardiovascular risk, stress, hypertension
MeSH terms
Rumination, Cognitive, Adult, Attention, Blood Pressure, Cardiac Output, Female, Heart Rate, Hemodynamics, Humans, Imagination, Male, Problem Solving, Sex Characteristics, Vascular Resistance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review