Cited by 2Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus

Posterior Fossa Sub-Arachnoid Cysts Observed in Patients with Bipolar Disorder: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Open access
Ewald, Victόria A. Müller, Purnell, Jessica R., Bruss, Joel E., Barsotti, Ercole J., Aldine, Amro S., Mahachi, Kurayi G., Wemmie, John A., Magnotta, Vincent A. +3 more·2022·The Cerebellum

Abstract

Posterior fossa arachnoid cysts (PFACs) are rare congenital abnormalities observed in 0.3 to 1.7% of the population and are traditionally thought to be benign. While conducting a neuroimaging study investigating cerebellar structure in bipolar disorder, we observed a higher incidence of PFACs in bipolar patients (5 of 75; 6.6%) compared to the neuronormative control group (1 of 54; 1.8%). In this report, we detail the cases of the five patients with bipolar disorder who presented with PFACs. Additionally, we compare neuropsychiatric measures and cerebellar volumes of these patients to neuronormative controls and bipolar controls (those with bipolar disorder without neuroanatomical abnormalities). Our findings suggest that patients with bipolar disorder who also present with PFACs may have a milder symptom constellation relative to patients with bipolar disorder and no neuroanatomical abnormalities. Furthermore, our observations align with prior literature suggesting an association between PFACs and psychiatric symptoms that warrants further study. While acknowledging sample size limitations, our primary aim in the present work is to highlight a connection between PFACs and BD-associated symptoms and encourage further study of cerebellar abnormalities in psychiatry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12311-022-01408-1

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cerebellar lesions and peri-cerebellar cysts are associated with a higher risk of bipolar disorder symptom presentation.

    “Additionally, cerebellar lesions and peri-cerebellar cysts have been associated with a higher risk of bipolar disorder symptom presentation (Ewald et al., 2022; Lauterbach, 1996).”

    From A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial of cerebellar intermittent theta burst stimulation for bipolar disorder: Safety, tolerability, mood and cognitive effects (2025) · cites this paper as Ewald et al., 2022

    The Introduction reports that posterior fossa arachnoid cysts occurred more often in participants with bipolar disorder than in controls, and the Discussion describes a connection between the cysts and bipolar-disorder-associated symptoms. But the study does not establish that cerebellar lesions or cysts increase the risk of symptom presentation; its Discussion cautions against causal conclusions, and its Results suggest milder symptoms in the bipolar group with cysts than in the bipolar group without them. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [17]JH H, Analysis on clinical characteristics of intracranial arachnoid cysts in 488 pediatric cases. Int J Clin Exp Med. PMC4694337 26770437
  2. [34]Jenkinson M,, FSL. Neuroimage, 2012. 62(2): p. 782– 90. 21979382
  3. [38]Sheehan DV,, The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry, 1998. 59 Suppl 20: p. 22– 33; quiz 34-57. 9881538

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ewald, V. A. M., Purnell, J. R., Bruss, J. E., Barsotti, E. J., Aldine, A. S., Mahachi, K. G., Wemmie, J. A., Magnotta, V. A., Boes, A. D., Parker, K. L., & Fiedorowicz, J. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans (US)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Parker, Krystal L.
Venue
The Cerebellum
Published
2022-05-14
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
370-378
ISSN
  • 1473-4222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4230
OpenAlex
W4280505350
Cited by
2
References
47
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Cerebellum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (RO1 MH 118240)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Keywords
posterior fossa arachnoid cyst, bipolar disorder, cerebellar abnormalities, cerebellar volume, neuropsychiatric symptoms, congenital brain anomalies, symptom severity
MeSH terms
Bipolar Disorder, Cerebellum, Cranial Fossa, Posterior, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Retrospective Studies, Arachnoid Cysts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review