Cited by 84Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderCognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

A pilot study of combined working memory and inhibition training for children with AD/HD

Johnstone, Stuart J., Roodenrys, Steven, Phillips, Elise, Watt, Annele J., Mantz, Sharlene·2010·ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders

Abstract

Building on recent favourable outcomes using working memory (WM) training, this study examined the behavioural and physiological effect of concurrent computer-based WM and inhibition training for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD). Using a double-blind active-control design, 29 children with AD/HD completed a 5-week at-home training programme and pre- and post-training sessions which included the assessment of overt behaviour, resting EEG, as well as task performance, skin conductance level and event-related potentials (ERPs) during a Go/Nogo task. Results indicated that after training, children from the high-intensity training condition showed reduced frequency of inattention and hyperactivity symptoms. Although there were trends for improved Go/Nogo performance, increased arousal and specific training effects for the inhibition-related N2 ERP component, they failed to reach standard levels of statistical significance. Both the low- and high-intensity conditions showed resting EEG changes (increased delta, reduced alpha and theta activity) and improved early attention alerting to Go and Nogo stimuli, as indicated by the N1 ERP component, post-training. Despite limitations, this preliminary work indicates the potential for cognitive training that concurrently targets the interrelated processes of WM and inhibition to be used as a treatment for AD/HD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12402-009-0017-z

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnstone, S. J., Roodenrys, S., Phillips, E., Watt, A. J., & Mantz, S.
Affiliations
University of Wollongong (AU)
Corresponding author
Johnstone, Stuart J.
Venue
ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders
Published
2010-01-28
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
31-42
ISSN
  • 1866-6116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-6647
OpenAlex
W2034110333
Cited by
84
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, working memory training, inhibition training, cognitive training, children, go/no-go task, event-related potentials, resting-state EEG, skin conductance, inattention, hyperactivity, exercise intensity
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Pilot Projects, Psychomotor Performance, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Brain Waves

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review