Cited by 101Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Training and transfer effects of response inhibition training in children and adults

Open access
Zhao, Xin, Chen, Ling, Maes, Joseph H.R.·2018·Developmental Science

Abstract

Response inhibition is crucial for mental and physical health but studies assessing the trainability of this type of inhibition are rare. Thirty‐nine children aged 10‐12 years and 46 adults aged 18‐24 years were assigned to an adaptive go/no‐go inhibition training condition or an active control condition. Transfer of training effects to performance on tasks assessing response inhibition, interference control, working memory updating, task‐switching, and non‐verbal fluid intelligence were assessed during 3‐ and 6‐month follow‐up sessions and/or an immediate post‐training session. Significant training improvements and positive transfer effects to a similar response inhibition task with other stimuli were observed for both children and adults. Reliable albeit short‐lived transfer effects were only found for the children, specifically to working memory updating and task switching. These results suggest some potential for response‐inhibition training programs to enhance aspects of cognitive functioning in children but not adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/desc.12511

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children and adolescents often show larger or more efficient transfer.

    “Children and adolescents – those undergoing neurocognitive development – often show larger or more efficient transfer (Liu et al., 2023; Zhao et al., 2018)”

    From The asymmetry of working memory training transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2018

    The Conclusion reports transfer effects in children but only a short-lived effect on the go/no-go task in young adults, suggesting greater potential for training-induced improvements in children. The study did not examine adolescents, and its findings do not establish that larger or more efficient transfer occurs often. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Logan, G.D. (1994). Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language: A users' guide to the Stop Signal paradigm. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, X., Chen, L., & Maes, J. H. R.
Affiliations
  • Northwest Normal University (CN)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Maes, Joseph H.R.
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-12-13
Volume
21
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
OpenAlex
W2565499108
Cited by
98
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
FWCI
9.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31300838, 31560283)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
response inhibition, cognitive training, transfer of training, go/no-go task, children, adults, working memory updating, task switching, interference control, fluid intelligence, cognitive aging, cognitive development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Cognition, Education, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Intelligence, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Reaction Time, Transfer, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review