Cited by 85Mental Health Treatment and AccessAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPsychology and Mental Health

Internalized stigma, anticipated discrimination and perceived public stigma in adults with ADHD

Masuch, Theresa Vera, Bea, Myriam, Alm, Barbara, Deibler, Peter, Sobanski, Esther·2019·ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders

Abstract

The objective of this study is to assess internalized stigma, perceived public stigma, anticipated discrimination and their associations with demographic, psychiatric and psychosocial characteristics in adult ADHD. Stigmatization was assessed with the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale, the Questionnaire on Anticipated Discrimination and the Questionnaire on Public Stereotypes Perceived by Adults with ADHD. The sample comprised n = 104 adults with ADHD, of whom n = 24 (23.3%) reported high internalized stigma, n = 92 (88.5%) anticipated discrimination in daily life and n = 70 (69.3%) perceived public stigma. Internalized stigma and/or anticipated discrimination correlated with ADHD symptoms, psychological distress, self-esteem, functional impairment and quality of life and was associated with ADHD family history and employment status. Most frequently perceived stereotypes were doubts about the validity of ADHD as a mental disorder. Internalized stigma and anticipated discrimination are highly prevalent in adult ADHD and correlate with the burden of disease. ADHD is associated with characteristic public stereotypes, which are distinct from stereotypes related to other mental disorders. Stigmatization should be considered in the clinical management of adult ADHD and evaluated further in future studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12402-018-0274-9

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masuch, T. V., Bea, M., Alm, B., Deibler, P., & Sobanski, E.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Sobanski, Esther
Venue
ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders
Published
2018-10-19
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
211-220
ISSN
  • 1866-6116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-6647
OpenAlex
W2897772912
Cited by
85
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
adult ADHD, self-stigma, anticipated discrimination, perceived public stigma, mental health stigma, psychological distress, self-esteem, quality of life, functional disability, employment status, family history of ADHD
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Female, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Self Concept, Stereotyping, Young Adult, Social Stigma, Anticipation, Psychological, Social Discrimination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review