Cited by 511Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and Regulation

Google DeepMind and healthcare in an age of algorithms

Open access
Powles, Julia, Hodson, Hal·2017·Health and Technology

Abstract

Data-driven tools and techniques, particularly machine learning methods that underpin artificial intelligence, offer promise in improving healthcare systems and services. One of the companies aspiring to pioneer these advances is DeepMind Technologies Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Google conglomerate, Alphabet Inc. In 2016, DeepMind announced its first major health project: a collaboration with the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, to assist in the management of acute kidney injury. Initially received with great enthusiasm, the collaboration has suffered from a lack of clarity and openness, with issues of privacy and power emerging as potent challenges as the project has unfolded. Taking the DeepMind-Royal Free case study as its pivot, this article draws a number of lessons on the transfer of population-derived datasets to large private prospectors, identifying critical questions for policy-makers, industry and individuals as healthcare moves into an algorithmic age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12553-017-0179-1

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When Google DeepMind collaborated with the Royal Free Hospital, they encountered a conflict between protecting the privacy of patient data and their goal of using AI to improve early diagnosis of acute kidney injury.

    “For example, when Google DeepMind collaborated with the Royal Free Hospital, they encountered a conflict between protecting the privacy of patient data, and their goal of using AI to improve early diagnosis of acute kidney injury [20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [31]Personal communication, O’Brien D, Royal Free press office to Hodson, 14 Jul 2016.
  2. [53]Personal communication, O’Brien D, Royal Free press office to Hodson, 15 Jun 2016.
  3. [56]Personal communication, CQC press office to Hodson, 14 Oct 2016.
  4. [63]Data Protection Act 1998 (UK), s.1(1), 4.
  5. [67]For a comprehensive and critical analysis of these concepts, see Van Alsenoy B. Regulating data protection: the allocation of responsibility and risk among actors involved in personal data processing. 2016. KU Leuven doctoral thesis. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/545027/1/PhD_thesis_Van_Alsenoy_Brendan_archived.pdf.
  6. [92]Charette RN. Automated to death. IEEE Spectrum. 15 Dec 2009. http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/automated-to-death.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powles, J., & Hodson, H.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Powles, Julia
Venue
Health and Technology
Published
2017-03-16
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
351-367
ISSN
  • 2190-7188 (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-7196
OpenAlex
W2596192549
Cited by
511
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
24.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health and Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
University of Cambridge
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Keywords
DeepMind, acute kidney injury, machine learning in healthcare, artificial intelligence in healthcare, data privacy, power imbalance, health data governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review