PreprintCited by 67Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIEthics and bioethics in healthcare

The Debate on the Ethics of AI in Health Care: a Reconstruction and Critical Review

Open access
Morley, Jessica, Machado, Caio, Burr, Christopher, Cowls, Josh, Taddeo, Mariarosaria, Floridi, Luciano·2019·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3486518

Cites

158 of 158 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morley, J., Machado, C., Burr, C., Cowls, J., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Morley, Jessica
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3003851578
Cited by
66
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N023013/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, machine learning, AI ethics, ethical frameworks, regulatory framework, legal framework, AI governance, healthcare automation, epistemic ethics, normative ethics, social ethics, healthcare policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review