Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5Indian and Buddhist StudiesArt Education and DevelopmentChinese history and philosophy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chan teaching and learning: an aesthetic analysis of its educational import

Meng, Lingqi, Uhrmacher, P. Bruce·2014·Asia Pacific Education Review
DOI 10.1007/s12564-014-9317-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12564-014-9317-x

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Biggs, J. B., & Watkins, D. A. (2001). Insight into teaching the Chinese learner. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological, and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 277–300). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong; Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Education Research.
  2. Cai, Z. (1992). Wudeng Huiyuan. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju Press.
  3. Dai, G. (2008). Applying a Chan principle to children’s educational life. The Modern Education Journal, 141(3), 62–63.
  4. Fu, J. (2007). The enlightenment of Chan and its meanings in educational philosophy. Nationalities Forum, 6, 50–51.
  5. Liu, S. (1997). The study of Chan and its societal meanings. Journal of Central China Normal University, 36(2), 115–128.
  6. Nan, H. (1996). A lecture on Chan practice. Beijing: Chinese World Language Press.
  7. Pan, Y., & Liang, Y. (2009). Chan method and its implication to education. Journal of Cultural and Educational Documents, 17(6), 108–109.
  8. Su, S. (2005). Hongzhou Chan. Beijing: Culture and Religon Publisher.
  9. Su, W. (2010). The ideas of Chan and modern psychological counseling. Journal of Theoretic Observation, 66(6), 49–50.
  10. Wang, H. (2004). The call from stranger on a journey home. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
  11. Wang, J. (2012). John Dewey in China. Albany: SUNY press.
  12. Xiong, H. (2011). Strengthening the infiltration of mathematical thought and developing mathematical thinking ability. Curriculum, Teaching Material, and Method, 31(9), 61–66.
  13. Xiong, W., & Yu, L. (2010). Studying the thought of psycholotherapy of the mind—Nature of Chan. Journal of Psychological Exploration, 30(2), 7–10.
  14. Yang, Y. (2011). Chan and its educational principle. Science and Technology Innovation Herald, 5, 153–154.

Cited by

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Meng, L., & Uhrmacher, P. B.
Affiliations
  • Qufu Normal University (CN)
  • University of Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Meng, Lingqi
ORCID
Venue
Asia Pacific Education Review
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-04-19
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
199-209
ISSN
  • 1598-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-407X
DOI
10.1007/s12564-014-9317-x
OpenAlex
W1993926835
Cited by
5
References
38
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
13.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Asia Pacific Education Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
Keywords
Zen Buddhism, sudden enlightenment, Buddhist education, aesthetic education, teaching-learning process, risk-taking, imagination, sensory experience, student engagement, creative thinking, Chinese learners, lecture-based learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chan teaching and learning: an aesthetic analysis of its educational import. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12564-014-9317-x
The paper
Meng, L., & Uhrmacher, P. B. (2014). Chan teaching and learning: an aesthetic analysis of its educational import. Asia Pacific Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-014-9317-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.