Cited by 32Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Body Mindfulness Questionnaire

Burg, Jan M., Probst, Thomas, Heidenreich, Thomas, Michalak, Johannes·2017·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-016-0659-9

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burg, J. M., Probst, T., Heidenreich, T., & Michalak, J.
Affiliations
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
  • Esslingen University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Corresponding author
Michalak, Johannes
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2016-12-26
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
807-818
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2567640188
Cited by
32
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG:Mi 700/4–1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
body awareness, mindfulness measurement, scale development, psychometric properties, mindfulness-based interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review