Cited by 349Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Differential changes in self-reported aspects of interoceptive awareness through 3 months of contemplative training

Open access
Bornemann, Boris, Herbert, Beate M., Mehling, Wolf E., Singer, Tania·2015·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Interoceptive body awareness (IA) is crucial for psychological well-being and plays an important role in many contemplative traditions. However, until recently, standardized self-report measures of IA were scarce, not comprehensive, and the effects of interoceptive training on such measures were largely unknown. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) questionnaire measures IA with eight different scales. In the current study, we investigated whether and how these different aspects of IA are influenced by a 3-months contemplative intervention in the context of the ReSource project, in which 148 subjects engaged in daily practices of "Body Scan" and "Breath Meditation." We developed a German version of the MAIA and tested it in a large and diverse sample (n = 1,076). Internal consistencies were similar to the English version (0.56-0.89), retest reliability was high (rs: 0.66-0.79), and the MAIA showed good convergent and discriminant validity. Importantly, interoceptive training improved five out of eight aspects of IA, compared to a retest control group. Participants with low IA scores at baseline showed the biggest changes. Whereas practice duration only weakly predicted individual differences in change, self-reported liking of the practices and degree of integration into daily life predicted changes on most scales. Interestingly, the magnitude of observed changes varied across scales. The strongest changes were observed for the regulatory aspects of IA, that is, how the body is used for self-regulation in daily life. No significant changes were observed for the Noticing aspect (becoming aware of bodily changes), which is the aspect that is predominantly assessed in other IA measures. This differential pattern underscores the importance to assess IA multi-dimensionally, particularly when interested in enhancement of IA through contemplative practice or other mind-body interventions.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

A German version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) was validated and used to test whether 3 months of contemplative training changed self-reported interoceptive awareness. Training improved five of eight MAIA aspects relative to a retest control group, with strongest changes in regulatory aspects and no significant change in Noticing.

Key findings

  • The German MAIA showed internal consistencies from 0.56 to 0.89, retest reliability from 0.66 to 0.79, and good convergent/discriminant validity in a validation sample of n = 1,076.
  • In the intervention study, the training group (final n = 148) improved on five of eight MAIA scales versus the retest control group (n = 80); group × time interactions were significant for five scales, all Fs ≥ 4.34, all ps ≤ 0.04, but not for Noticing, Not-Worrying, or Not-Distracting.
  • Largest training-related effect sizes were Self-Regulation d = 0.72, Attention Regulation d = 0.54, and Body Listening d = 0.40; Noticing showed no significant interaction effect.
  • Participants with lower baseline MAIA scores showed greater improvements across scales (correlations of baseline with change ranged from –0.18, p = 0.016, for Body Listening to –0.44, p < 0.001, for Noticing); practice duration weakly predicted change, while liking and daily-life integration predicted changes on most scales.

Methods

  • The German MAIA was translated and validated in a diverse sample of 1,076 subjects (345 male; mean age = 38.7, SD = 9.3), using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha, retest reliability, and correlations with FFMQ, PBCS, and STAI-T.
  • The intervention subsample included 152 training participants and 80 retest controls; four training participants did not complete training, leaving n = 148 for analysis. Training was the 3-month Presence module of the ReSource project: a 3-day silent retreat, weekly 2-h classes for 13 weeks, and home practice five times per week for 30 min (20 min Body Scan, 10 min Breath Meditation).
  • MAIA was assessed before and after training (average interval 113.6 days, SD = 10.7, in the training group; 113.0 days, SD = 4.3, in controls). Main analyses used repeated-measures ANOVA for group × time interactions, intra-individual t-tests, effect sizes, and correlations/regressions with practice time and post-training appreciation measures.

Limitations

  • The paper states that IA was assessed only by self-report, so it is unclear how strongly self-reported IA corresponds to objective measures; participants may have answered according to demand characteristics, and meditation practice may have altered their understanding of the MAIA items.
  • The paper states that the training sample comprised only psychologically and physiologically healthy individuals, leaving open how the intervention affects body awareness in people with mental or physical problems.
  • The text also makes evident that Not-Distracting and Not-Worrying had low internal consistencies (0.56 and 0.65), the control group did not complete the PBCS so interaction effects for that measure could not be tested, and baseline-dependent improvements may be inflated by regression to the mean.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01504

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

0 of 33 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Practice duration only weakly predicted individual differences in change on the MAIA scales.

    “Whereas practice duration only weakly predicted individual differences in change”
    • Also stated in: § DEPENDENCY OF TRAINING EFFECT ON PRACTICE DURATION AND PRACTICE APPRECIATION · plain
      “Total practice time, that is, how long participants spent meditating throughout the training (assessed by the web platform and smart phone app) predicted increases in Self-Regulation, r = 0.18, p = 0.027, and Trusting r = 0.19, p = 0.019, but not on the other scales.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The online platform and smartphone app accurately tracked how often and how long participants practiced meditation.
  • Findingown data

    Self-reported liking of the practices and degree of integration into daily life predicted changes on most MAIA scales.

    “self-reported liking of the practices and degree of integration into daily life predicted changes on most scales”
    • Also stated in: § DEPENDENCY OF TRAINING EFFECT ON PRACTICE DURATION AND PRACTICE APPRECIATION · plain
      “Both LikingPractice and PracticeUse were predictive of changes on the five MAIA scales that showed the strongest intervention effects and on the Noticing scale (rs between 0.19 and 0.43, all ps < 0.05).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The post-training questionnaire items validly measure appreciation and integration of the practices into daily life.
  • Findingown data

    No significant changes were observed for the Noticing aspect of interoceptive awareness.

    “No significant changes were observed for the Noticing aspect (becoming aware of bodily changes), which is the aspect that is predominantly assessed in other IA measures.”
    • Also stated in: § LONGITUDINAL TRAINING-RELATED CHANGES IN MAIA · plain
      “It was not significant for Noticing, Not-Worrying, and Not-Distracting.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Participants with low interoceptive awareness scores at baseline showed the biggest changes.

    “Participants with low IA scores at baseline showed the biggest changes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The German MAIA showed high retest reliability, with correlations ranging from 0.66 to 0.79.

    “retest reliability was high (rs: 0.66–0.79)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 27
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 10
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The German MAIA showed internal consistencies ranging from 0.56 to 0.89, similar to the English version.

    “Internal consistencies were similar to the English version (0.56–0.89)”
    • Also stated in: § PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES AND VALIDATION · plain
      “All Cronbach’s alphas ranged between 0.56 and 0.89.”
    • Also stated in: § PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES AND VALIDATION · plain
      “Alphas were higher than in the English Version for four scales (Noticing, Attention Regulation, Emotional Awareness, Trusting, p < 0.05), lower for one scale (Not-Distracting, p < 0.05), and not statistically different for the remaining three scales (p > 0.05).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mehling et al. (2012) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The German MAIA showed good convergent and discriminant validity.

    “the MAIA showed good convergent and discriminant validity”
    • Also stated in: § PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES AND VALIDATION · plain
      “All MAIA scales show positive or non-significant correlations with the FFMQ scales.”
    • Also stated in: § PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES AND VALIDATION · plain
      “All MAIA scales show negative or non-significant correlations with the STAI-T.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The effect size for the Private Body Consciousness Scale was d = 0.29, expressing a statistically significant within-group change.

    “We also computed the effect size for the PBCS as an alternative body awareness measure. It was d = 0.29, expressing a statistically significant change in a within-group t-test, t(147) = 4.19, p < 0.001.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Compared with the English MAIA, German MAIA alphas were higher for four scales, lower for one scale, and not statistically different for the remaining three scales.

    “Alphas were higher than in the English Version for four scales (Noticing, Attention Regulation, Emotional Awareness, Trusting, p < 0.05), lower for one scale (Not-Distracting, p < 0.05), and not statistically different for the remaining three scales (p > 0.05).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mehling et al. (2012) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All MAIA scales showed positive correlations with the Private Body Consciousness Scale, except Not-Worrying, where the correlation was non-significant.

    “All MAIA scales show positive correlations to the PBSC, except for Not-Worrying, where the correlation is non-significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The reliability and validity of the German MAIA are comparable to the English version.

    “Both are comparable to the English version.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Not-Worrying scale did not improve significantly in comparison to the control group; changes were only significant in intra-individual t-tests.

    “The scale Not-Worrying did not improve significantly, when tested in comparison to the control group (changes are only significant in intra-individual t-tests).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In comparison to a control group, participants showed no significant changes on the MAIA Noticing scale; changes were only significant in an intra-individual t-test without control-group comparison.

    “Self-reported Noticing of bodily signals, which is the aspect that previous studies have predominantly investigated using questionnaires and objective measures of interoceptive accuracy, does not show significant changes”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “Participants show no changes on the Noticing scale (only significant in an intra-individual t-test, without comparison to the control group).”
    • Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
      “changes in the self-reported ability to notice bodily changes, such as changes in breathing or heartbeat, are not statistically significant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Reliable correlations were only found for growth on Attention Regulation, Self-Regulation, and Trusting, and those were relatively small (∼0.2).

    “Reliable correlations were only found for growth on Attention Regulation, Self-Regulation, and Trusting, and those were relatively small (∼0.2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    PracticeUse and LikingPractice were intercorrelated and both were related to total practice time.

    “PracticeUse and LikingPractice were intercorrelated, r = 0.34, p < 0.001, and both were related to total practice time (r = 0.23, p = 0.005 and r = 0.32, p < 0.001, respectively).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The online platform and smartphone app accurately tracked how often and how long participants practiced meditation.
    • Rests on an assumption: The post-training questionnaire items validly measure appreciation and integration of the practices into daily life.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All changes were independent of sex and age, except for slightly higher improvements in emotional awareness for women.

    “All changes were independent of sex and age (except for slightly higher improvements in emotional awareness for women).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    When using baseline-corrected T1 values, total number of meditations predicted increases in Attention Regulation, Self-Regulation, and Trusting.

    “When again using a baseline corrected T1 value, predictions became slightly better, with total number of meditations predicting increases in Attention Regulation, r = 0.18, p = 0.028, Self-Regulation, r = 0.22, p = 0.007, and Trusting, r = 0.20, p = 0.013 (see Table 5).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The online platform and smartphone app accurately tracked how often and how long participants practiced meditation.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The ReSource project was particularly appropriate for investigating training-related changes in interoceptive awareness because it relies on a large sample and its first 3-month training module was specifically designed to cultivate interoceptive awareness through daily Body Scan and Breath Meditation practices.

    “The ReSource project appeared to be particularly appropriate for such an investigation, because it relies on a large sample (n = 148) that, in the first 3-months training module, underwent an intervention, which was specifically designed to cultivate IA through daily practices of a “Body Scan” (BoS) and a “Breath Meditation” (BrM; see Materials and Methods).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    There is cross-sectional evidence for differences in the Noticing aspect of interoceptive awareness in meditators, and qualitative evidence from mostly short-term longitudinal studies about training-induced changes in many other aspects of interoceptive awareness.

    “To summarize, there is cross-sectional evidence for differences in the Noticing aspect of IA in meditators, and qualitative evidence from mostly short-term longitudinal studies about training-induced changes in many other aspects of IA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The daily core exercises, Body Scan and Breath Meditation, were chosen because both train attention as well as interoceptive awareness.

    “The daily core exercise, the BoS and the BrM, have been chosen as they both train attention as well as IA.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kabat-Zinn, 1990

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wallace, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Adherence to practice was generally high, with participants attending on average 11.6 of 13 group sessions and practicing Body Scan 4.6 times per week and Breath Meditation 4.33 times per week.

    “Adherence to practice was generally high. Participants attended, on average, 11.6 (SD = 1.1) out of the 13 group sessions.”
    • Also stated in: § LONGITUDINAL TRAINING-RELATED CHANGES IN MAIA · plain
      “Outside of the weekly group sessions, participants practiced the BoS (for at least for 20 min) 4.6 times a week (SD = 1.09) and the BrM (for at least 10 min) 4.33 times as week (SD = 1.04), which is only marginally less than they were asked to do (five times a week for each practice).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most standardized questionnaires do not fully assess interoceptive awareness because they assess only one dimension or assess different aspects together in one scale.

    “However, most standardized questionnaires do not fully use this potential, either because they assess only one dimension of IA (e.g., Body Awareness Questionnaire, Shields et al., 1989; Private Body Consciousness Scale, Miller et al., 1981) or because they assess different aspects together in one scale (see Mehling et al., 2009, for a review).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Shields et al., 1989 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Miller et al., 1981 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Mehling et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Participants in the retest control group did not differ statistically from those in the training group in age, sex, socio-economic status, or any MAIA scale values at baseline.

    “Participants in the retest control group did not differ statistically from those in the training group (all ps < 0.05) in terms of age, sex, socio-economic status (assessed as income and education level), or any of the MAIA scale values at baseline.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Vipassana meditators showed higher scores than controls on three interoceptive awareness scales that mostly measure Noticing.

    “Sze et al. (2010) studied IA cross-sectionally in Vipassana meditators compared to controls, using three IA scales that mostly measure Noticing, and found higher scores in meditators.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sze et al. (2010) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The MAIA is a 32-item self-report measure that measures interoceptive awareness on eight dimensions.

    “The result of these investigations is the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA, Mehling et al., 2012), a 32-item self-report measure that measures IA on eight dimensions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mehling et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The back-translation and the original English MAIA questionnaire were identical or very similar in wording and meaning.

    “All items were found to be identical or very similar in wording and meaning so that no further corrections had to be applied.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Noticing aspects of interoceptive awareness have been shown to be increased in yoga practitioners.

    “Similarly, Noticing aspects of IA have been shown to be increased in yoga practitioners (Rani and Rao, 1994; Daubenmier, 2005; Impett et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Rani and Rao, 1994

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Daubenmier, 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Impett et al., 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Patients with meditation experience of any kind showed higher scores on four of the eight MAIA scales compared with meditation-naive controls, with strongest effects in Self-Regulation.

    “Higher scores on four of the eight MAIA scales were shown for patients with meditation experience of any kind compared to meditation naïve controls, with strongest effects in Self-Regulation (Mehling et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mehling et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The findings on MAIA and meditation experience in pain patients are limited by the cross-sectional nature of the study, the high heterogeneity of meditation practices, and the specific population.

    “These findings are, however, limited by the cross-sectional nature of the study, the high heterogeneity of meditation practices, and the specific population (pain patients).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Contemplative training may become more effective, at least in fostering interoceptive awareness, if participants enjoy the training and the exercises and if the practices are easy to integrate into everyday life.

    “Our findings suggest that contemplative training may become more effective, at least in fostering IA, if participants enjoy the training and the exercises and if the practices are tailored in ways that they are easy to integrate into everyday life.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The underlying constructs of Not-Distracting and Not-Worrying may need more thorough definition and their items need adjustment.

    “suggesting that the underlying constructs may need more thorough definition and the items need to be adjusted accordingly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Self-Regulation, Attention Regulation, and Body Listening can be collectively described as the regulatory aspects of interoceptive awareness.

    “These could be collectively described as the regulatory aspects of IA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The practices strengthen participants' abilities to direct attention toward their bodies (Attention Regulation), to regulate distress (Self-Regulation), and to gain insight into their emotional-motivational state (Body Listening).

    “Our findings indicate that these practices strengthen participants’ abilities to direct attention toward their bodies (Attention Regulation) and that they make use of these abilities to regulate distress (Self-Regulation) and to gain insight into their emotional-motivational state (Body Listening).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Presence training benefited men and women, old and young people alike with regard to interoceptive awareness, but may have particularly benefited participants who started off with lower baseline values.

    “These findings indicate that the Presence training of the ReSource study benefited men and women, old and young people alike with regard to IA, but may have particularly benefited participants who started off with lower baseline values.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Several cross-sectional studies in long-term meditators found moderately sized correspondence between lifetime practice hours and interoceptive abilities and brain structure, and some longitudinal training studies demonstrate dose-dependent effects.

    “Clearly, several cross-sectional studies in long term meditators found moderately sized correspondence between lifetime practice hours and outcome variables such as interospective abilities (Fox et al., 2012), and brain structure (Lazar et al., 2005), and some longitudinal training studies also demonstrate dose-dependent effects (e.g., Carmody and Baer, 2008; Pace et al., 2009; Rosenzweig et al.,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Fox et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lazar et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Carmody and Baer, 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Contemplative advice emphasizes practicing in everyday life, as most time is spent outside formal practice and everyday life is the target of transformation.

    “This is in line with contemplative advice to put strong emphasis on practicing in everyday life, as most time is spent outside of formal practice and, ultimately, it is everyday life that the transformation is targeted for (Williams and Penman, 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Williams and Penman, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Mental training that involves focus on body sensations improves several aspects of interoceptive awareness, and particularly strengthens participants' use of body sensations to become more aware of emotions and to regulate distress.

    “It shows that mental training that involves focus on body sensations improves several aspects of IA, and particularly that it strengthens participants’ use of body sensations to become more aware of emotions and to regulate distress.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported MAIA scores validly reflect interoceptive awareness, or at least correspond closely enough to actual interoceptive awareness to support conclusions about training-related changes in IA.
32 of 32
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The retest control group accounts for effects of repeated testing.

    “Eighty subjects (32 male; mean age = 43.3, SD = 8.6; age range = 23–55) served as a retest control group, to account for effects of repeated testing.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The online platform and smartphone app accurately tracked how often and how long participants practiced meditation.

    “Participants were asked to always use the platform or smart phone when meditating, which allowed us to track how often and long they practiced.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The post-training questionnaire items validly measure appreciation and integration of the practices into daily life.

    “Here, we use some of these questions as markers of training success.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Self-reported MAIA scores validly reflect interoceptive awareness, or at least correspond closely enough to actual interoceptive awareness to support conclusions about training-related changes in IA.

    “It is not clear to which extend self-reported IA corresponds to IA as assessed through objective measures.”
    “Whether and how strongly these changes are objectively induced can, however, not be clarified by the current study.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Total practice time recorded by the daily practice computer platform accurately reflects participants' actual amount of practice.

    “total practice time, assessed through the daily practice computer platform”
    “as assessed through our meditation platform during daily individual practice”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To improve interoception relies on attention and perception of internal stimuli.

    “It is generally believed that to improve interoception relies on attention and perception of internal stimuli (Mehling et al., 2012; Bornemann et al., 2015; Garcia-Cordero et al., 2017).”

    From Mindfulness, Interoception, and the Body: A Contemporary Perspective (2019) · cites this paper as Bornemann et al., 2015

    The Conclusion says that training focused on body sensations improved several aspects of self-reported interoceptive awareness, and the Discussion identifies deliberate attention to those sensations as central to the training. The paper does not establish that attention and perception are necessary to improve interoception generally; its Introduction also questions whether contemplative practice improves objective interoceptive sensitivity. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One study found no noticeable changes in an objective or noticing dimension as measured by the MAIA after three months of interoceptive training.

    “One study found no noticeable changes in an objective or “noticing” dimension as measured by the MAIA after three months of interoceptive training (Bornemann et al., 2015).”

    From Mindfulness, Interoception, and the Body: A Contemporary Perspective (2019) · cites this paper as Bornemann et al., 2015

    The Discussion reports no significant training-related change on the MAIA Noticing scale after three months, compared with the control group. But it describes Noticing as a subjective self-report rating, not an objective measure; the Limitations section says the study cannot establish changes using objective tests. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a healthy population, simply attending to the body from a variety of contemplative practices appears to increase IA with its associated benefits.

    “To be clear, in a healthy population, simply attending to the body from a variety of contemplative practices appears to increase IA with its associated benefits (Gibson, 2014; Villemure et al., 2014; Bornemann et al., 2015; Schmalzl et al., 2015), but increasing IA in a clinical population can be problematic.”

    From Mindfulness, Interoception, and the Body: A Contemporary Perspective (2019) · cites this paper as Bornemann et al., 2015

    The Methods describe psychologically and physically healthy participants, and the Discussion reports increased self-reported interoceptive awareness after three months of Body Scan and Breathing Meditation. The Conclusion also reports gains in using body sensations for emotional awareness and distress regulation. The study did not test a wider variety of practices or establish broader well-being benefits; it presents well-being as a possible implication. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Meditation has been found to increase self-reported interoceptive attention, as measured by the MAIA, and confidence and perceived ease in completing the heartbeat discrimination task.

    “Indeed, meditation has been found to increase self-reported interoceptive attention, as measured by the MAIA (Bornemann et al., 2015), and confidence and perceived ease in completing the heartbeat discrimination task (Khalsa et al., 2008).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Bornemann et al., 2015

  • Improvements were reported for the subscale of Emotional Awareness in several studies.

    “This is in line with the improvements reported for the subscale of Emotional Awareness in several studies [114,115,116,119,120,123,130,135] and other information related to emotion regulation.”

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentt(226) = 0.45reported p = .66 · recomputed p = .653

    “t(226) = 0.45, p = .66”

  • Consistentt(147) = 4.19reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(147) = 4.19, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(146) = 1.99reported p = .048 · recomputed p = .048

    “t(146) = 1.99, p = .048”

  • ConsistentF(3, 135) = 15.8reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(3,135) = 15.80, p < .001”

4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Validation-sample counts do not sum to the reported total

    Minor

    The six sample sizes in Table 2 sum to 1,040, not the reported full-sample size of 1,076-a difference of 36 participants.

    Reported 1076 · recomputed 1040

  • Male counts exceed the reported full-sample count

    Minor

    The male counts in Table 2 sum to 362, rather than the reported 345.

    Reported 345 · recomputed 362

  • Two different mean ages are given for the control group

    Minor

    The prose gives the retest control group's mean age as 43.3 years, while Table 2 gives 42.3 years for the same 80 participants.

  • FFMQ correlation is marked negative and significant despite the summary claim

    Minor

    The text says every MAIA-FFMQ correlation is positive or non-significant, but Table 4 marks the negative Not-Distracting-NOR correlation as significant.

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Goldstein, 1995, The Path of Insight Meditation.
  2. Hart, 1987, The Art of Living: Vipassana Meditation As Taught
  3. Otto, 2012, Achtsamkeit - Selbstzuwendung oder Vermeidungsverhalten? Eine Studie über den Zusammenhang von Achtsamkeit, psychopathologischem Befinden, emotionaler Kompetenz und Bindungsfähigkeit, Diploma-Thesis, University of Hamburg, Hamburg.
  4. Rinpoche, 2012, Open Heart, Open Mind.
  5. Williams, 2011, Mindfulness. A practical Guide to Finding Peace in a Frantic World.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bornemann, B., Herbert, B. M., Mehling, W. E., & Singer, T.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Singer, Tania
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2015-01-06
Volume
5
Pages
1504-1504
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156892222
Cited by
349
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
30.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • OPen Access Repositorium der Universität Ulm (OPARU) (Ulm University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Universität Ulm, Kommunikations- und Informationszentrum (kiz) (cc-by)
Funders
FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (205557)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
interoceptive awareness, interoceptive training, contemplative practice, body scanning, Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, German translation, self-regulation, noticing, mind-body interventions, psychological well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review