Cited by 29Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersFree Will and AgencyMental Health and Psychiatry

The sense of agency in OCD

Szalai, Judit·2019·Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13164-017-0371-2

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szalai, J.
Affiliations
Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
Corresponding author
Szalai, Judit
Venue
Review of Philosophy and Psychology
Published
2017-12-12
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
363-380
ISSN
  • 1878-5158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-5166
OpenAlex
W2773928906
Cited by
29
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Philosophy and Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
OTKA (120375)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, sense of agency, dysfunctional cognitions, metacognition, motor impairment, delusions of control, schizophrenia, agency attribution, bottom-up processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review