CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16Homelessness and Social IssuesHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Improving health while saving money: Lessons learned from a supportive housing program for young adults with HIV

Dodd, S. J., Ruffins, Jeannette, Arzola, Denise·2018·Sexuality Research and Social Policy
DOI 10.1007/s13178-017-0287-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13178-017-0287-8

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HIV treatment service use was examined in a one-group evaluation of a scattered-site Housing First program for young adults with HIV, finding that all 27 participants remained connected to an HIV treatment provider throughout their housing tenures.

    “HIV treatment service use was examined in a one-group evaluation of a scattered-site Housing First program for young adults with HIV, finding that all 27 participants remained connected to an HIV treatment provider throughout their housing tenures (Dodd et al., 2018).”

    From Harm reduction outcomes and practices in Housing First: A mixed-methods systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Dodd et al., 2018

  • In homeless or unstably housed HIV-positive young adults, all participants maintained connection to an HIV treatment provider.

    “All participants maintained connection to an HIV treatment provider”

    From Harm reduction outcomes and practices in Housing First: A mixed-methods systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Dodd et al. (2018)

  • In homeless or unstably housed HIV-positive young adults, participants maintained or decreased viral loads during the evaluation period.

    “participants having maintained or decreased viral loads during the evaluation period”

    From Harm reduction outcomes and practices in Housing First: A mixed-methods systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Dodd et al. (2018)

  • In homeless or unstably housed HIV-positive young adults, 50% of participants experienced increased CD4+ counts (mean scores not computed).

    “50% of participants experienced increased CD4 + counts (mean scores not computed)”

    From Harm reduction outcomes and practices in Housing First: A mixed-methods systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Dodd et al. (2018)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Dodd, S. J., Ruffins, J., & Arzola, D.
Affiliations
City University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Dodd, S. J.
ORCID
Dodd, S. J.
Venue
Sexuality Research and Social Policy
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-05-24
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
163-171
ISSN
  • 1553-6610 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-9884
DOI
10.1007/s13178-017-0287-8
OpenAlex
W2617700801
Cited by
15
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
Sexuality Research and Social Policy (publishedVersion)
Funders
Office of Housing and Urban Development (HOPWA SPNS Project No. NYH080026)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
supported housing, HIV, young adults, homelessness, Housing First, return on investment, harm reduction, case management, medical data mining, structural interventions, health outcomes, rental assistance, New York City

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review