Cited by 16Human Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisComplex Network Analysis TechniquesInformation Retrieval and Data Mining

Activity correlation spectroscopy: a novel method for inferring social relationships from activity data

Zhang, Xuhong, Butts, Carter T.·2017·Social Network Analysis and Mining

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13278-016-0419-9

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., & Butts, C. T.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Butts, Carter T.
Venue
Social Network Analysis and Mining
Published
2016-12-10
Volume
7
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1869-5450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1869-5469
OpenAlex
W2559761425
Cited by
16
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Network Analysis and Mining (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (NSF OIA-1028394, IIS-1251267, IIS-1526736)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Data Mining
Keywords
social relationship inference, reality mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review