Cited by 23Polymer crystallization and propertiesbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies

Viscoelastic properties of PLA/PCL blends compatibilized with different methods

Shin, Boo Young, Han, Do Hung·2017·Korea-Australia Rheology Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13367-017-0029-8

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shin, B. Y., & Han, D. H.
Affiliations
Yeungnam University (KR)
Corresponding author
Shin, Boo Young
Venue
Korea-Australia Rheology Journal
Published
2017-11
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
295-302
ISSN
  • 1226-119X (ISSN-L)
  • 2093-7660
OpenAlex
W2770941851
Cited by
23
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Korea-Australia Rheology Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
Yeungnam University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Keywords
PLA/PCL blends, polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, polymer blend compatibilization, reactive extrusion, high-energy radiation, viscoelasticity, storage modulus, loss modulus, complex viscosity, stress relaxation, interfacial adhesion, blend morphology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review