Cited by 34biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesPolymer crystallization and propertiesBlock Copolymer Self-Assembly

High-Impact PLA in Compatibilized PLA/PCL Blends: Optimization of Blend Composition and Type and Content of Compatibilizer

Open access
Fernández‐Tena, Ainhoa, Otaegi, Itziar, Irusta, Lourdes, Sebastián, Victor, Guerrica‐Echevarria, Gonzalo, Müller, Alejandro Jesus, Aranburu, Nora·2023·Macromolecular Materials and Engineering

Abstract

Abstract In this work, the effectiveness of seven commercial compatibilizers is tested in polylactide (PLA)/poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL) blends with different compositions to obtain a high‐impact PLA. None of the compatibilizers is effective for 90/10 and 80/20 PLA/PCL compositions, as no improvement of the impact strength is observed. For the 70/30 composition, compatibilizers having glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) and acrylate groups in their structure are proved the most effective, as the morphological change towards co‐continuity induced by them leads to significant impact strength improvements (of ≈345% and 90% with respect to the neat PLA and the noncompatibilized PLA/PCL 70/30 blend, respectively). The 70/30 PLA/PCL composition, as it shows the best balance of properties, and the best compatibilizer (ElvaloyPTW) are chosen to carry out the optimization of the compatibilizer content. It is found that adding 6 phr to the blend results in highly toughened and ductile blends while maintaining a high modulus and yield strength values. Larger compatibilizer contents lead to even higher impact strength values, but the low‐strain mechanical properties are notably reduced. Thus, in this work, a simple and easily scalable method to produce high‐impact PLA is shown, as it implies the compounding of three commercially available components without involving any toxic solvents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mame.202300213

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. M. Nofar, D. Sacligil, P. J. Carreau, M. R. Kamal, M.-C. Heuzey, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 125, 307.
  2. R. Siakeng, M. Jawaid, H. Ariffin, S. M. Sapuan, M. Asim, N. Saba, Polym. Compos. 2018, 40, 446.
  3. R. M. Rasal, A. V. Janorkar, D. E. Hirt, Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 338.
  4. S. Saeidlou, M. A. Huneault, H. Li, C. B. Park, Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 1657.
  5. A. M. Harris, E. C. Lee, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 107, 2246.
  6. G. Liu, X. Zhang, D. Wang, Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6905.
  7. Y. Yang, L. Zhang, Z. Xiong, Z. Tang, R. Zhang, J. Zhu, Sci China Chem 2016, 59, 1355.
  8. K. Anderson, K. Schreck, M. Hillmyer, Polym. Rev. 2008, 48, 85.
  9. G. Kfoury, J.-M. Raquez, F. Hassouna, J. Odent, V. Toniazzo, D. Ruch, P. Dubois, Front Chem 2013, 1, 32.
  10. X. Zhao, H. Hu, X. Wang, X. Yu, W. Zhou, S. Peng, RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 13316.
  11. I. Fortelny, A. Ujcic, L. Fambri, M. Slouf, Front. Mater. 2019, 6, 206.
  12. J. Urquijo, G. Guerrica-Echevarría, J. I. Eguiazábal, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 42641.
  13. J. M. Ferri, O. Fenollar, A. Jorda-Vilaplana, D. García-Sanoguera, R. Balart, Polym. Int. 2016, 65, 453.
  14. N. Kassos, A. L. Kelly, T. Gough, A. A. Gill, Mater Res Express 2019, 6, 035313.
  15. J.-T. Yeh, C.-J.u Wu, C.-H. Tsou, W.-L. Chai, J.-D. Chow, C.-Y. Huang, K.-N. Chen, C.-S. Wu, Polym. -Plast. Technol. Eng. 2009, 48, 571.
  16. H. Zhao, G. Zhao, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016, 53, 59.
  17. I. Navarro-Baena, V. Sessini, F. Dominici, L. Torre, J. M. Kenny, L. Peponi, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2016, 132, 97.
  18. P. Wongwiwattana, N. L. Thomas, Polym.-Plast. Technol. Mater. 2021, 60, 1393.
  19. C. L. Simões, J. C. Viana, A. M. Cunha, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 112, 345.
  20. M. Delgado-Aguilar, R. Puig, I. Sazdovski, P. Fullana-I-Palmer, Mate- rials 2020, 13, 2655.
  21. N. López-Rodríguez, A. López-Arraiza, E. Meaurio, J. R. Sarasua, Polym. Eng. Sci. 2006, 46, 1299.
  22. O. Monticelli, M. Calabrese, L. Gardella, A. Fina, E. Gioffredi, Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 58, 69.
  23. L. Gardella, M. Calabrese, O. Monticelli, Colloid Polym. Sci. 2014, 292, 2391.
  24. H. Bai, H. Xiu, J. Gao, H. Deng, Q. Zhang, M. Yang, Q. Fu, ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2012, 4, 897.
  25. J. Chen, C. Deng, R. Hong, Q. Fu, J. Zhang, J. Polym. Res. 2020, 27, 221.
  26. W.-J. Si, H. Zhang, Y.i-D. Li, C. Huang, Y.-X. Weng, J.-B. Zeng, Com- posites, Part B Eng. 2020, 197, 108155.
  27. H. Bai, C. Huang, H. Xiu, Y. Gao, Q. Zhang, Q. Fu, Polymer 2013, 54, 5257.
  28. A. Ostafinska, I. Fortelny, M. Nevoralova, J. Hodan, J. Kredatusova, M. Slouf, RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 98971.
  29. A. Ostafinska, I. Fortelný, J. Hodan, S. Krejčíková, M. Nevoralová, J. Kredatusová, Z. Kruliš, J. Kotek, M. Šlouf, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2017, 69, 229.
  30. V. Vilay, M. Mariatti, Z. Ahmad, K. Pasomsouk, M. Todo, Mater. Sci. Eng., A 2010, 527, 6930.
  31. M. Harada, K. Iida, K. Okamoto, H. Hayashi, K. Hirano, Polym. Eng. Sci. 2008, 48, 1359.
  32. A.o-L. Hou, J.-P. Qu, Polymers 2019, 11, 771.
  33. A. Bouzouita, C. Samuel, D. Notta-Cuvier, J. Odent, F. Lauro, P. Dubois, J.-M. Raquez, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43402.
  34. M. Safari, A. Mugica, M. Zubitur, A. Martínez De Ilarduya, S. Muñoz- Guerra, A. J. Müller, Polymers 2020, 12, 17.
  35. J. O. Akindoyo, M. D. H. Beg, S. Ghazali, H. P. Heim, M. Feldmann, Composites, Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 107, 326.
  36. Y. Yuryev, A. K. Mohanty, M. Misra, Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2016, 301, 1443.
  37. O. J. Botlhoko, J. Ramontja, S. S. Ray, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2018, 154, 84.
  38. G. Maglio, M. Malinconico, A. Migliozzi, G. Groeninckx, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2004, 205, 946.
  39. F. Sakai, K. Nishikawa, Y. Inoue, K. Yazawa, Macromolecules 2009, 42, 8335.
  40. Y. Meyva, C. Kaynak, Plast. Rubber Composites 2016, 45, 189.
  41. L. Q. Xu, Y. Q. Zhao, R. Y. Chen, B. H. Kang, X. F. Peng, Int. Polym. Process. 2016, 31, 301.
  42. N. Bagotia, B. P. Singh, V. Choudhary, D. K. Sharma, RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 87589.
  43. G. Bayram, U. Yilmazer, M. Xanthos, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 80, 790.
  44. D. Wu, Y. Zhang, M. Zhang, W. Zhou, Eur. Polym. J. 2008, 44, 2171.
  45. J. Zhao, H. Pan, H. Yang, J. Bian, H. Zhang, G.e Gao, L. Dong, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 143, 443.
  46. E. A. Cumkur, T. Baouz, U. Yilmazer, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 42553.
  47. S. Jia, Y. Chen, Y. Yu, L. Han, H. Zhang, L. Dong, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 127, 415.
  48. B. Xue, H.e-Z. He, Z.-X. Huang, Z. Zhu, F. Xue, S. Liu, B. Liu, Com- posites, Part B. 2019, 172, 743.
  49. P. Juntuek, C. Ruksakulpiwat, P. Chumsamrong, Y. Ruksakulpiwat, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 125, 745.
  50. A. Teamsinsungvon, R. Jarapanyacheep, Y. Ruksakulpiwat, K. Jarukumjorn, Polym. Sci. -Ser. A 2017, 59, 384.
  51. R. R. N. Sailaja, A. P. Reddy, M. Chanda, Polym. Int. 2001, 50, 1352.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernández‐Tena, A., Otaegi, I., Irusta, L., Sebastián, V., Guerrica‐Echevarria, G., Müller, A. J., & Aranburu, N.
Affiliations
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
  • Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering. University of Zaragoza Campus Río Ebro‐Edificio I+D C/ Poeta Mariano Esquillor S/N Zaragoza 50018 Spain
  • POLYMAT and Department of Advanced Polymers and Materials: Physics Chemistry and Technology Faculty of Chemistry University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal 3 Donostia‐San Sebastián 20018 Spain
  • Ikerbasque (ES)
Corresponding author
Aranburu, Nora
Venue
Macromolecular Materials and Engineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-09-22
Volume
308
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 1438-7492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-2054
OpenAlex
W4386967143
Cited by
34
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 4
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Macromolecular Materials and Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zaguan (University of Zaragoza Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Communities in ADDI (University of the Basque Country) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Eusko Jaurlaritza (IT1503‐22)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2021‐127847OB‐I00)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
Keywords
polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, PLA/PCL blends, compatibilization, impact strength, glycidyl methacrylate, blend composition, toughening, ductility, biodegradable polymers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review