Cited by 76biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesPolymer Nanocomposites and PropertiesPolymer crystallization and properties

Biodegradable nanocomposites developed from PLA/PCL blends and silk fibroin nanoparticles: Study on the microstructure, thermal behavior, crystallinity and performance

Open access
Dadras Chomachayi, Masoud, Jalali-arani, Azam, Beltrán, Freddys R., de la Orden, Ma Ulagares, Martínez Urreaga, Joaquín·2020·Journal of Polymers and the Environment

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10924-020-01684-0

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Blending can modify the crystallization behavior of both polymers, sometimes resulting in separate melting peaks indicative of phase immiscibility, although compatibilized blends can exhibit enhanced crystallinity due to improved phase interactions.

    “Thermal analysis via DSC shows that blending can modify the crystallization behavior of both polymers, sometimes resulting in separate melting peaks indicative of phase immiscibility, although compatibilized blends can exhibit enhanced crystallinity due to improved phase interactions [27].”

    From Nanocellulose-Reinforced Poly(Lactic Acid) and Poly(ε-caprolactone) Bio-Nanocomposites: A Review and Future Outlook for Poly(Lactic Acid)/Poly(ε-caprolactone) Blend Systems (2025) · cites this paper as [27]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • PLA/PCL blends maintain biodegradability and have been investigated for applications in packaging and biomedical devices.

    “Furthermore, PLA/PCL blends maintain biodegradability and have been investigated for applications in packaging and biomedical devices [27,89].”

    From Nanocellulose-Reinforced Poly(Lactic Acid) and Poly(ε-caprolactone) Bio-Nanocomposites: A Review and Future Outlook for Poly(Lactic Acid)/Poly(ε-caprolactone) Blend Systems (2025) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Introduction describes PCL as biodegradable and suitable for packaging and medical applications, and the paper investigates PLA/PCL blends. The Conclusions propose the PLA/PCL/SFNP nanocomposite for food packaging. Our copy does not establish that the PLA/PCL blends retain biodegradability or have been investigated for biomedical devices; the medical-applications statement concerns PCL itself. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • PLA and PCL are inherently immiscible due to differences in polarity and crystallinity, which results in phase-separated morphologies.

    “PLA, characterized by high stiffness and brittleness, and PCL, known for its flexibility and toughness, are inherently immiscible due to differences in polarity and crystallinity, which results in phase-separated morphologies [26,27,88,89].”

    From Nanocellulose-Reinforced Poly(Lactic Acid) and Poly(ε-caprolactone) Bio-Nanocomposites: A Review and Future Outlook for Poly(Lactic Acid)/Poly(ε-caprolactone) Blend Systems (2025) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) calls PLA and PCL thermodynamically immiscible, and §3.2.1 reports isolated PCL droplets in a PLA matrix. Section 3.2.3 describes different crystallization behavior, but the paper does not attribute immiscibility to differences in polarity or crystallinity. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Melt blending SFNPs at 1.0 wt.% offers benefits suitable for food packaging.

    “Melt blending these SFNPs at 1.0 wt.% offers benefits suitable for food packaging, where thermal resistance and safety are priorities [27].”

    From Nanocellulose-Reinforced Poly(Lactic Acid) and Poly(ε-caprolactone) Bio-Nanocomposites: A Review and Future Outlook for Poly(Lactic Acid)/Poly(ε-caprolactone) Blend Systems (2025) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Preparation section describes extrusion of the blends, and the Conclusions report benefits from adding 1% SFNP to PLA/PCL. Section 3.2.5 links the improved water-vapor barrier to a property important for food packaging. The Conclusions qualify the thermal benefit as a slight improvement only at the end of the degradation-temperature range, while degradation temperature fell in the early stages; the copy does not establish food-contact safety. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Inclusion of SFNPs improves the thermal stability and compatibility of PLA/PCL composites without the need for surface modifications.

    “Additionally, the inclusion of natural biopolymer reinforcements such as SFNPs improves the thermal stability and compatibility of PLA/PCL composites without the need for surface modifications.”

    From Nanocellulose-Reinforced Poly(Lactic Acid) and Poly(ε-caprolactone) Bio-Nanocomposites: A Review and Future Outlook for Poly(Lactic Acid)/Poly(ε-caprolactone) Blend Systems (2025) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Conclusions report improved interfacial adhesion and slightly improved thermal stability at the end of the degradation range, but also a lower degradation temperature at early stages. Section 2.2 describes preparing SFNPs without a separate surface-modification step; it does not establish that surface modification is generally unnecessary. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Di Y, Iannace S, Di Maio E, et al. Nanocomposites by melt intercalation based on polycaprolactone and organoclay. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 2003; 41: 670-678.
  2. Kim SH, Nam YS, Lee TS, et al. Silk fibroin nanofiber. Electrospinning, properties, and structure. Polym J 2003; 35: 185-190.
  3. Di Foggia M, Taddei P, Torreggiani A, et al. SELF-ASSEMBLING PEPTIDES FOR BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS: IR AND RAMAN SPECTROSCOPIES FOR THE STUDY OF SECONDARY STRUCTURE. Proteomics Res J 2011; 2: 231.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dadras Chomachayi, M., Jalali-arani, A., Beltrán, F. R., de la Orden, M. U., & Martínez Urreaga, J.
Affiliations
Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología de Polímeros (ES)
Venue
Journal of Polymers and the Environment
Published
2020-02-24
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
1252-1264
ISSN
  • 1064-7546 (ISSN-L)
  • 1566-2543
  • 1572-8919
OpenAlex
W3007344565
Cited by
76
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Polymers and the Environment (publishedVersion)
  • UPM Digital Archive (Technical University of Madrid) (submittedVersion)
  • Docta Complutense (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM-RP-160543006, RP 160543006)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
Keywords
biodegradable nanocomposites, polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, PLA/PCL blends, silk fibroin nanoparticles, blend compatibility, thermal stability, crystallization kinetics, microhardness, barrier properties, food packaging, natural fillers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review