Cited by 346Student Assessment and FeedbackInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational and Psychological Assessments

Fusing Self-Regulated Learning and Formative Assessment: A Roadmap of where We Are, How We Got Here, and where We Are Going

Panadero, Ernesto, Andrade, Heidi, Brookhart, Susan·2018·The Australian Educational Researcher

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
  • Duquesne University (US)
Corresponding author
Panadero, Ernesto
Venue
The Australian Educational Researcher
Published
2018-02-08
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
13-31
ISSN
  • 0311-6999 (ISSN-L)
  • 2210-5328
OpenAlex
W2791597258
Cited by
346
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8
FWCI
67.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Australian Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (RYC-2013-13469)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
Keywords
student self-regulation, formative assessment, assessment for learning, student metacognition, evidence synthesis, future research directions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review