Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment
Open accessAbstract
In schools and universities, assessment practices shape teaching and learning practices. This is the first book to comprehensively explain the human and social factors impacting assessment. With research from leading experts, the Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment engages many forms of assessment ranging from low-stakes, learning-oriented, formative practices (classroom assessments, peer- or self-assessment) to high-stakes, accountability or certification testing and examination. This book will be an unprecedented resource for researchers and scholars interested in the human factors that affect assessment and how they impact teaching, learning, and assessment itself.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627 · Cited by 7,176 · see citing works
High-Stakes Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitative Metasynthesis
Au, W. (2007) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x07306523 · Cited by 1,250 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Particularly salient was the issue of how to develop important skills like critical thinking, while simultaneously teaching what would be on the state test, goals often in direct conflict (Au, 2007).”
BackgroundAssessing the impact of planned social change
Campbell, D. T. (1979) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(79)90048-x · Cited by 867 · see citing works
Below the Bubble: “Educational Triage” and the Texas Accountability System
Booher-Jennings, J. (2005) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312042002231 · Cited by 762 · cited 8× · see citing works
“…tests in the U.S. in 2001, we have come to learn a great deal about the intended and unintended effects of high-stakes testing practices on teachers and their students within the United States (Boohrer-Jennings, 2005; Jones, Jones, & Hargrove, 2003; Nichols & Berliner, 2007a; Valenzuela, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work
Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3 · Cited by 810 · see citing works
A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements
Panadero, E., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100416 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Boeren, E. (2019) · International Review of Education · doi:10.1007/s11159-019-09772-7 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Data-based decision-making for school improvement: Research insights and gaps
Schildkamp, K. (2019) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00131881.2019.1625716 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. (2018) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y · Cited by 346 · see citing works
A cyclical self-assessment process: towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment
Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. L. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Self-citationPanadero, E., & Alqassab, M. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Dialogue within peer feedback processes: clarification and negotiation of meaning
Zhu, Q., & Carless, D. (2018) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2018.1446417 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Misconceptions about data-based decision making in education: An exploration of the literature
Mandinach, E. B., & Schildkamp, K. (2021) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100842 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Student Conceptions of Feedback: Impact on Self-Regulation, Self-Efficacy, and Academic Achievement
Brown, G. T. L., Peterson, E. R., & Yao, E. S. (2016) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12126 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
A critical review of the arguments against the use of rubrics
Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2020) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100329 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Panadero, E., Broadbent, J., Boud, D., & Lodge, J. M. (2019) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-018-0407-8 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
“However, there is a growing and, by now, well-established interest in the broader notion of self-assessment and its effects on learning (Boud 1995; Andrade and Brown 2016).”
BackgroundStudent Perceptions of Assessment Feedback: A Critical Scoping Review and Call for Research
Van der Kleij, F. M., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2021) · Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-020-09331-x · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Mei, B., Brown, G. T. L., & Teo, T. (2018) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633117700144 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Self-citationUsing principles of authentic assessment to redesign written examinations and tests
Villarroel, V., Boud, D., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., & Bruna, C. (2020) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2018.1564882 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Bauer, E., Greisel, M., Kuznetsov, I., Berndt, M., Kollar, I., Dresel, M., Fischer, M. R., & Fischer, F. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13336 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Shen, B., Bai, B., & Xue, W. (2020) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100821 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
A systematic review on peer assessment: intrapersonal and interpersonal factors
Panadero, E., Alqassab, M., Fernández Ruiz, J., & Ocampo, J. C. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2164884 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Sysoyev, P. V. (2024) · Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia · doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-2-31-53 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Lui, A. M., & Andrade, H. L. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.751548 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Pham, T. N., Lin, M., Trinh, V. Q., & Bui, L. T. P. (2020) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244020914554 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Student self-assessment: why do they do it?
Yan, Z., Brown, G. T. L., Lee, J. C.-K., & Qiu, X.-L. (2020) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.1672038 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationA systematic review of the key components of online peer feedback practices in higher education
Gao, X., Noroozi, O., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H. J. A., & Banihashem, S. K. (2024) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100588 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Leighton, J. P. (2019) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/jedm.12237 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Teachers’ Conceptions of Fairness in Classroom Assessment: An Empirical Study
Rasooli, A., Rasegh, A., Zandi, H., & Firoozi, T. (2023) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/00224871221130742 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Affordances of narrative and numerical data: A social-semiotic approach to data use
Fjørtoft, H., & Lai, M. K. (2021) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100846 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Masked ball for all: how anonymity affects students' perceived comfort levels in peer feedback
Su, W. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2089348 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Implementation of a collaborative data use model in a United States context
Jimerson, J. B., Garry, V., Poortman, C. L., & Schildkamp, K. (2021) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100866 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Gonthier, C., Grégoire, J., & Besançon, M. (2021) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101512 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Investigating the effectiveness of anonymous online peer feedback in translation technology teaching
Sha, L., Wang, X., Ma, S., & Mortimer, T. A. (2022) · The Interpreter and Translator Trainer · doi:10.1080/1750399x.2022.2097984 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Kim, S. (2023) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2022.2073983 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Orbán, L. L. (2023) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1169938 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts
Zhong, Y., Davies, M., & Wilson, A. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12816 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brown, G., & Harris, L.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2016-06-23
- OpenAlex
- W2625657822
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 11
- FWCI
- 74.94
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- educational assessment, formative assessment, classroom assessment, peer assessment, self-assessment, high-stakes testing, accountability testing, certification examination, examinations, teaching and learning practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
