Cited by 53Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisHealth disparities and outcomesCriminal Justice and Penology

The Consequences of Incarceration for Mortality in the United States

Open access
Daza, Sebastian, Palloni, Alberto, Jones, Jerrett·2020·Demography

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that incarceration has negative implications for individuals’ well-being, health, and mortality. Most of these studies, however, have not followed former prisoners over an extended period and into older adult ages, when the risk of health deterioration and mortality is the greatest. Contributing to this literature, this study is the first to employ the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) to estimate the long-run association between individual incarceration and mortality over nearly 40 years. We also supplement those analyses with data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 (NLSY79). We then use these estimates to investigate the implications of the U.S. incarceration regime and the post-1980 incarceration boom for the U.S. health and mortality disadvantage relative to industrialized peer countries (the United Kingdom).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13524-020-00869-5

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Incarcerated individuals experience a four-to five-year reduction in life expectancy.

    “Daza and colleagues (2020) found that incarcerated individuals experienced a four-to five-year reduction in life expectancy.”

    From Innocence Mortality Tax: The Impact of Wrongful Conviction on Lifespan (2023) · cites this paper as Daza et al., 2020

    The Results report an approximately four- to five-year difference in life expectancy at age 45 between former prisoners and people who had not been in prison. The Conclusion and Discussion describes this as an association. The citing sentence gives the right magnitude but omits the age and former-prisoner qualifiers and may imply a causal reduction that the paper does not establish. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Arias E, Heron M, & Xu J (2017). United states life tables, 2013. National Vital Statistics Report, 66(3), 1– 64. 28437241
  2. Baćak V & Wildeman C [Christopher] (2015). An empirical assessment of the “healthy prisoner hypothesis”. Social Science & Medicine, 138, 187– 191. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.039 26114835 · DOI
  3. Banks J, Marmot M, Oldfield Z, & Smith JP (2006). Disease and disadvantage in the United States and in England. JAMA, 295(17), 2037– 2045. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.17.2037 16670412 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Binswanger IA, Stern MF, Deyo RA, Heagerty PJ, Cheadle A, Elmore JG, & Koepsell TD (2007). Release from prison - a high risk of death for former inmates. New England Journal of Medicine, 356(2), 157– 165. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa064115 17215533 PMC2836121 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Garland D (2002). The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society (1 edition). Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
  6. Gelman A & Carlin J (2014). Beyond power calculations assessing type s (sign) and type m (magnitude) errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641– 651. Retrieved from http://pps.sagepub.com/content/9/6/641.short 26186114
  7. Hernán MA & Robins JM (2006). Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1979-), 60(7), 578– 586. 16790829 PMC2652882
  8. Houle JN & Martin MA (2011). Does intergenerational mobility shape psychological distress? sorokin revisited. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 29(2), 193– 203. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2010.11.001 25152556 PMC4139926 · DOI
  9. Kirkwood TBL (2015). Deciphering death: A commentary on gompertz (1825) ‘on the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1666). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0379 PMC4360127 25750242 · DOI
  10. Massoglia M (2008a). Incarceration as exposure: The prison, infectious disease, and other stress related illnesses. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 49(1), 56– 71. doi: 10.1177/002214650804900105 18418985 · DOI
  11. Massoglia M (2008b). Incarceration, health, and racial disparities in health. Law & Society Review, 42(2), 275– 306. doi: 10.11n/j.1540-5893.2008.00342.x
  12. Massoglia M, Pare P-P, Schnittker J, & Gagnon A (2014). The relationship between incarceration and premature adult mortality: Gender specific evidence. Social Science Research, 46, 142– 154. 24767596 PMC6123019
  13. Massoglia M & Pridemore WA (2015). Incarceration and health. Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1), 291– 310. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112326 PMC6124689 30197467 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Massoglia M & Warner C (2011). The consequences of incarceration. Criminology & Public Policy, 10(3), 851– 863. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00754.x · DOI
  15. Olshansky SJ, Antonucci T, Berkman L, Binstock RH, Boersch-Supan A, Cacioppo JT, … Goldman DP, (2012). Differences in life expectancy due to race and educational differences are widening, and many may not catch up. Health Affairs, 31(8), 1803– 1813. 22869659
  16. Patterson EJ [Evelyn J] (2010). Incarcerating death: Mortality in u.s. state correctional facilities, 1985-1998. Demography, 47(3), 587– 607. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3000056%5C&tool=pmcentrez%5C&rendertype=abstract 20879679 PMC3000056
  17. Rosen DL, Schoenbach VJ, & Wohl DA (2008). All-cause and cause-specific mortality among men released from state prison, 1980–2005. American Journal of Public Health, 98(12), 2278– 2284. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.121855 18923131 PMC2636544 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Schnittker J & John A (2007). Enduring stigma: The long-term effects of incarceration on health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 48(2), 115– 130. doi: 10.1177/002214650704800202 17583269 · DOI
  19. Spaulding AC, Seals RM, McCallum VA, Perez SD, Brzozowski AK, & Steenland NK (2011). Prisoner survival inside and outside of the institution: Implications for health-care planning. American Journal of Epidemiology, 173(5), 479– 487. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq422 21239522 PMC3044840 · DOI
  20. Turney K (2015). Hopelessly devoted? relationship quality during and after incarceration. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(2), 480– 495. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.library.wisc.edu/doi/10.1111/jomf.12174/full PMC10691835 38047042 · DOI
  21. Uggen C, Manza J, & Thompson M (2006). Citizenship, democracy, and the civic reintegration of criminal offenders. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605(1), 281– 310.
  22. van der Wal WM & Geskus RB (2011). Ipw: An R package for inverse probability weighting. Journal of Statistical Software, 43(13), 1– 23.
  23. Western B (2002). The impact of incarceration on wage mobility and inequality. American Sociological Review, 67(4), 526– 546. doi: 10.2307/3088944 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Wildeman C (2009). Parental imprisonment, the prison boom, and the concentration of childhood disadvantage. Demography, 46(2), 265– 280. 21305393 PMC2831279
  25. Wildeman C [Christopher] (2016). Incarceration and population health in wealthy democracies. Criminology, 54(2), 360– 382.
  26. Wildeman C [Christopher] & Wang EA (2017). Mass incarceration, public health, and widening inequality in the usa. The Lancet, 389(10077), 1464– 1474. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736 28402828 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daza, S., Palloni, A., & Jones, J.
Affiliations
  • Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1180 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
  • Palloni, Alberto
  • Jones, Jerrett
Venue
Demography
Published
2020-03-19
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
577-598
ISSN
  • 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-7790
OpenAlex
W3011227495
Cited by
53
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Demography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison (P30 AG017266)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG017266, P01AG029409, P30AG017266)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD047873, P2CHD047873)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
incarceration, mortality, former prisoners, older adults, health disadvantage, United Kingdom comparison, Panel Study of Income Dynamics, National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979
MeSH terms
Correctional Facilities, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Health Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Mortality, Prisoners, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review