CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 256Migration, Refugees, and IntegrationSocial and Intergroup PsychologyMigration and Labor Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does Information Change Attitudes Toward Immigrants?

Open access
Grigorieff, Alexis, Roth, Christopher, Ubfal, Diego·2020·Demography
DOI 10.1007/s13524-020-00882-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Strategies aimed at reducing negative attitudes toward immigrants are at the core of integration policies. A large literature shows that misperceptions about the size and characteristics of immigrants are common. A few studies implemented interventions to correct innumeracy regarding the size of the immigrant population, but they did not detect any effects on attitudes. We study whether providing information not only about the size but also about the characteristics of the immigrant population can have stronger effects. We conduct two online experiments with samples from the United States, providing one-half of the participants with five statistics about immigration. This information bundle improves people’s attitudes toward current legal immigrants. Most effects are driven by Republicans and other groups with more negative initial attitudes toward immigrants. In our second experiment, we show that treatment effects persist one month later. Finally, we analyze a large cross-country survey experiment to provide external validity to the finding that information about the size of the foreign-born population is not enough to change policy views. We conclude that people with negative views on immigration before the intervention can become more supportive of immigration if their misperceptions about the characteristics of the foreign-born population are corrected.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13524-020-00882-8

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Alesina A. , MianoA., & StantchevaS. (2018). Immigration and redistribution (NBER Working Paper No. 24733). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w24733.pdf
  2. Haaland I. , & RothC. (2018). Labor market concerns and support for immigration (Working paper). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3017420
  3. Sides J. , & CitrinJ. (2007, April). How large the huddled masses? The causes and consequences of public misperceptions about immigrant populations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b1ee/53927e699c37f80aaf3b54d8efc86b69ad32.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–256 of 256

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Grigorieff, A., Roth, C., & Ubfal, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (US)
Corresponding author
  • Grigorieff, Alexis
  • Roth, Christopher
  • Ubfal, Diego
ORCID
Venue
Demography
Publisher
Duke University Press
Published
2020-06-01
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
1117-1143
ISSN
  • 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-7790
DOI
10.1007/s13524-020-00882-8
OpenAlex
W3036844501
Cited by
254
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 9
FWCI
39.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Demography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Oxford
  • European Commission (608109)
  • Università Bocconi
  • Uppsala Universitet
  • Economic and Social Research Council ([SSD/2/2/16])
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
Keywords
attitudes toward immigrants, immigration policy, information interventions, migrant characteristics, immigrant population size, partisanship, Republican voters, treatment persistence, public opinion change, integration policy
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude, Emigration and Immigration, Female, Humans, Male, Politics, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Knowledge, Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review