Cited by 20Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesResilience and Mental HealthCancer survivorship and care

Coping strategies in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis non-depressed patients and their associations with disease activity

Santangelo, Gabriella, Corte, Marida Della, Sparaco, Maddalena, Miele, Giuseppina, Garramone, Federica, Cropano, Maria, Esposito, Sabrina, Lavorgna, Luigi +3 more·2021·Acta Neurologica Belgica

Abstract

Few studies evaluated coping strategies in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) in relation to annualized relapse rate (ARR) and lesion load (LL). Overall, results might have been influenced by the inclusion of depressed patients. To investigate the coping strategies and their association to disease activity, we studied relapsing-remitting pwMS accurately selected to avoid the confounding effect of depression. Sixty-seven relapsing-remitting pwMS and 67 healthy subjects (HS) underwent to Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (I-COPE) and Coping Inventory for Stressful Situation (CISS) and Beck Depression Inventory-II. Cognitive performances, ARR, physical disability and magnetic resonance imaging T2-LL were assessed for correlation with coping and depression scores. pwMS showed lower scores than HSs on social support and turning to religion subscales of I-COPE and on emotion dimension of CISS. In pwMS, higher ARR was related to higher positive attitude and lower score on the turning to religion subscale of I-COPE. The present study revealed a less employment of emotion-based coping strategies in pwMS. A scarce use of faith for support and a frequent adoption of a positive attitude were associated with an increase of MS activity in terms of ARR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13760-019-01212-5

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Santangelo, G., Corte, M. D., Sparaco, M., Miele, G., Garramone, F., Cropano, M., Esposito, S., Lavorgna, L., Gallo, A., Tedeschi, G., & Bonavita, S.
Affiliations
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
Corresponding author
Santangelo, Gabriella
Venue
Acta Neurologica Belgica
Published
2019-09-30
Volume
121
Issue
2
Pages
465-471
ISSN
  • 0300-9009 (ISSN-L)
  • 2240-2993
OpenAlex
W2977327416
Cited by
20
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Neurologica Belgica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, coping strategies, disease activity, annualized relapse rate, lesion load, depression, emotion-focused coping, positive attitude, social support, physical disability, cognitive performance
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Prospective Studies, Disease Progression, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review