Cited by 200Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryFrailty in Older AdultsCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

The effects of physical prehabilitation in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a systematic review

Open access
Bruns, E. R. J., van den Heuvel, B., Buskens, C. J., van Duijvendijk, P., Festen, S., Wassenaar, E. B., van der Zaag, E. S., Bemelman, W. A. +1 more·2016·Colorectal Disease

Abstract

Aim: Prehabilitation, defined as enhancement of the preoperative condition of a patient, is a possible strategy for improving postoperative outcome. Lack of muscle strength and poor physical condition, increasingly prevalent in older patients, are risk factors for postoperative complications. Eighty‐five per cent of patients with colorectal cancer are aged over 60 years. Since surgery is the cornerstone of their treatment, this review systemically examined the literature on the effect of physical prehabilitation in older patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Method: Trials and case–control studies investigating the effect of physical prehabilitation in patients over 60 years undergoing colorectal surgery were retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE , CINAHL and the Cochrane library. Patient characteristics, the type of intervention and outcome measurements were recorded. The risk of bias and heterogeneity was assessed. Results: Five studies including 353 patients were identified. They were small, containing an average of 77 patients and were of moderate methodological quality. Compliance rates of the prehabilitation programme varied from 16 to 97%. None of the studies could identify a significant reduction of postoperative complications or length of hospital stay. Four studies showed physical improvement (walking distance, respiratory endurance) in the prehabilitation group. Clinical heterogeneity precluded a meta‐analysis. Conclusion: Prehabilitation is a possible means of enhancing the physical condition of patients preoperatively. The quality of studies in older patients undergoing colorectal surgery is poor, despite the increase in elderly people with colorectal cancer. Defining specific patient groups at risk and standardizing the outcome are essential for improving the results of treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/codi.13429

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Gillis C, Li C, Lee L et al. Prehabilitation versus rehabilita- tion. Anesthesiology 2015; 121: 937-47.
  2. Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ et al. Frailty as a pre- dictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210: 901-8.
  3. Giordan A, Golay A, Lagger G. Motivating for change: a new approach. J Med Person 2007; 5: 57-63.
  4. Hopman W, Towheed T. Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Can Med 2000; 163: 265-71.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bruns, E. R. J., van den Heuvel, B., Buskens, C. J., van Duijvendijk, P., Festen, S., Wassenaar, E. B., van der Zaag, E. S., Bemelman, W. A., & van Munster, B. C.
Affiliations
  • Gelre Hospitals (NL)
  • Department of Surgery VU Medical Centre Amsterdam the Netherlands
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Department of Surgery Gelre Hospitals Apeldoorn the Netherlands
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Department of Medicine University Medical Centre Groningen the Netherlands
Corresponding author
Bruns, E. R. J.
Venue
Colorectal Disease
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
O267-77
ISSN
  • 1462-8910 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1318
OpenAlex
W2462301047
Cited by
200
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Colorectal Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Keywords
prehabilitation, elderly patients, colorectal surgery, colorectal cancer, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, muscle strength, physical fitness, respiratory endurance, walking distance
MeSH terms
Walk Test, Aged, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Length of Stay, Physical Endurance, Postoperative Complications, Preoperative Care, Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Colorectal Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review