The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Open accessAbstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated significant clinical impact in improving overall survival of several malignancies associated with poor outcomes; however, only 20-40% of patients will show long-lasting survival. Further clarification of factors related to treatment response can support improvements in clinical outcome and guide the development of novel immune checkpoint therapies. In this article, we have provided an overview of the pharmacokinetic (PK) aspects related to current ICIs, which include target-mediated drug disposition and time-varying drug clearance. In response to the variation in treatment exposure of ICIs and the significant healthcare costs associated with these agents, arguments for both dose individualization and generalization are provided. We address important issues related to the efficacy and safety, the pharmacodynamics (PD), of ICIs, including exposure-response relationships related to clinical outcome. The unique PK and PD aspects of ICIs give rise to issues of confounding and suboptimal surrogate endpoints that complicate interpretation of exposure-response analysis. Biomarkers to identify patients benefiting from treatment with ICIs have been brought forward. However, validated biomarkers to monitor treatment response are currently lacking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Hodi, F. S., O'Day, S. J., McDermott, D. F., Weber, R. W., Sosman, J. A., Haanen, J. B., Gonzalez, R., Robert, C., Schadendorf, D., Hassel, J. C., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1003466 · Cited by 15,155
The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy
Pardoll, D. M. (2012) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3239 · Cited by 13,838
Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti–PD-1 antibody in cancer
Topalian, S. L., Hodi, F. S., Brahmer, J. R., Gettinger, S. N., Smith, D. C., McDermott, D. F., Powderly, J. D., Carvajal, R. D., Sosman, J. A., Atkins, M. B., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1200690 · Cited by 12,628
Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma
Larkin, J., Chiarion-Sileni, V., Gonzalez, R., Grob, J. J., Cowey, C. L., Lao, C. D., Schadendorf, D., Dummer, R., Smylie, M., Rutkowski, P., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1504030 · Cited by 8,157
Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer
Brahmer, J. R., Tykodi, S. S., Chow, L. Q. M., Hwu, W.-J., Topalian, S. L., Hwu, P., Drake, C. G., Camacho, L. H., Kauh, J., Odunsi, K., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1200694 · Cited by 7,945
Oncology meets immunology: the cancer-immunity cycle.
Chen, D. S., & Mellman, I. (2013) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.012 · Cited by 6,929
Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma
Robert, C., Schachter, J., Long, G. V., Arance, A., Grob, J. J., Mortier, L., Daud, A., Carlino, M. S., McNeil, C., Lotem, M., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1503093 · Cited by 5,887
The future of immune checkpoint therapy
Sharma, P., & Allison, J. P. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8172 · Cited by 4,878
Ipilimumab plus Dacarbazine for Previously Untreated Metastatic Melanoma
Robert, C., Thomas, L., Bondarenko, I., O'Day, S., Weber, J., Garbe, C., Lebbe, C., Baurain, J.-F., Testori, A., Grob, J.-J., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1104621 · Cited by 4,496
Wolchok, J. D., Hoos, A., O'Day, S., Weber, J. S., Hamid, O., Lebbé, C., Maio, M., Binder, M., Bohnsack, O., Nichol, G., et al. (2009) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-1624 · Cited by 3,222
Cited by
Safa, H., Johnson, D. H., Trinh, V. A., Rodgers, T. E., Lin, H., Suarez-Almazor, M. E., Fa’ak, F., Saberian, C., Yee, C., Davies, M. A., et al. (2019) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1186/s40425-019-0774-y · Cited by 312
Metallodrugs in cancer nanomedicine
Peña, Q., Wang, A., Zaremba, O., Shi, Y., Scheeren, H. W., Metselaar, J. M., Kiessling, F., Pallares, R. M., Wuttke, S., & Lammers, T. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00468a · Cited by 259
Lehmann, L. H., Cautela, J., Palaskas, N., Baik, A. H., Meijers, W. C., Allenbach, Y., Alexandre, J., Rassaf, T., Müller, O. J., Aras, M., et al. (2021) · JAMA Cardiology · doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2241 · Cited by 178
Raschi, E., Mazzarella, A., Antonazzo, I. C., Bendinelli, N., Forcesi, E., Tuccori, M., Moretti, U., Poluzzi, E., & De Ponti, F. (2019) · Targeted Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11523-019-00632-w · Cited by 101
Shemesh, C. S., Chanu, P., Jamsen, K., Wada, R., Rossato, G., Donaldson, F., Garg, A., Winter, H., Ruppel, J., Wang, X., et al. (2019) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1186/s40425-019-0791-x · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Centanni, M., Moes, D. J. A. R., Trocóniz, I. F., Ciccolini, J., & van Hasselt, J. G. C.
- Venue
- Clinical Pharmacokinetics
- Published
- 2019-02-28
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 835-857
- ISSN
- 0312-5963 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-1926
- OpenAlex
- W2919428266
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 101
- FWCI
- 15.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s40262-019-00748-2
- The paper
- Centanni, M., Moes, D. J. A. R., Trocóniz, I. F., Ciccolini, J., & van Hasselt, J. G. C. (2019). Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-019-00748-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
