Cited by 18Sports Performance and TrainingRegulation of Appetite and ObesityExercise and Physiological Responses

Markers of low energy availability in overreached athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kuikman, Megan A., Coates, Alexandra M., Burr, Jamie F.·2022·Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background Overreaching is the transient reduction in performance that occurs following training overload and is driven by an imbalance between stress and recovery. Low energy availability (LEA) may drive underperformance by compounding training stress; however, this has yet to be investigated systematically. Objective The aim of this study was to quantify changes in markers of LEA in athletes who demonstrated underperformance, and exercise performance in athletes with markers of LEA. Methods Studies using a ≥ 2-week training block with maintained or increased training loads that measured exercise performance and markers of LEA were identified using a systematic search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Changes from pre- to post-training were analyzed for (1) markers of LEA in underperforming athletes and (2) performance in athletes with ≥ 2 markers of LEA. Results From 56 identified studies, 14 separate groups of athletes demonstrated underperformance, with 50% also displaying ≥ 2 markers of LEA post-training. Eleven groups demonstrated ≥ 2 markers of LEA independent of underperformance and 37 had no performance reduction or ≥ 2 markers of LEA. In underperforming athletes, fat mass (d = - 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.54 to - 0.04; p = 0.02), resting metabolic rate (d = - 0.63, 95% CI - 1.22 to - 0.05; p = 0.03), and leptin (d = - 0.72, 95% CI - 1.08 to - 0.35; p 2 = 84.86%) could not be explained by the perf…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40279-022-01723-x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuikman, M. A., Coates, A. M., & Burr, J. F.
Affiliations
University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Burr, Jamie F.
Venue
Sports Medicine
Published
2022-07-11
Volume
52
Issue
12
Pages
2925-2941
ISSN
  • 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-2035
OpenAlex
W4285077514
Cited by
18
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
low energy availability, overreaching, training overload, exercise performance, underperformance, athletes, fat mass, resting metabolic rate, leptin, cortisol, insulin, testosterone, training stress, recovery, energy balance, training load, body composition, hormonal markers, injury risk, injury recovery time, injury prevention, injury rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Humans, Hydrocortisone, Testosterone, Biomarkers, Exercise, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review