Cited by 7Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Striving as a paradoxical strategy to deal with fears of compassion: impact on disordered eating

Open access
Duarte, João Afonso, Mendes, Ana Laura, Marta-Simões, Joana, Ferreira, Cláudia·2020·Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity

Abstract

Purpose Recent literature has documented the relationship between fears of compassion and disordered eating attitudes and behaviours. However, research on the processes underlying this association is still in the early stages. As such, this study tested a mediator model where insecure striving and inflexible eating (i.e. psychological inflexibility focused on eating) were hypothesized to mediate the impact of fears of compassion on the severity of disordered eating, while controlling for the effects of body mass index and age.Methods The study's sample comprised 310 Portuguese women from the general population, aged between 18 and 65 years, who completed an online survey.Results Path analysis results revealed that the impact of fear of compassion for self and for others on disordered eating was fully mediated by insecure striving and inflexible eating, whereas the impact of fear of compassion from others was only partly mediated by these processes. The tested model accounted for 48% of disordered eating's variance and presented excellent fit indices.Conclusions These results suggest that fears of experiencing compassion may preclude the experience of social safeness, hindering the activation of social mentalities other than rank-focused mentality. Maladaptive competitive strategies may ensue (insecure striving), such as inflexible eating, which is linked to the development of disordered eating. In terms of clinical implications, these findings stress the need to effectively assess and address fears of compassion, as they not only seem to be involved in the development of disordered eating, but also have been reported to be significant predictors of poor treatment outcomes.Level of evidence Level V, cross-sectional descriptive study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40519-019-00715-7

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duarte, J. A., Mendes, A. L., Marta-Simões, J., & Ferreira, C.
Affiliations
University of Coimbra (PT)
Corresponding author
Ferreira, Cláudia
Venue
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity
Published
2019-05-23
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
983-990
ISSN
  • 1124-4909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1590-1262
OpenAlex
W2945770359
Cited by
7
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
disordered eating, psychological inflexibility, social safeness, competitive strategy, mediation, women, body mass index
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Image, Cross-Sectional Studies, Empathy, Fear, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Self Concept, Shame, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review