Cited by 25Online Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningOnline and Blended Learning

Including Learning Analytics in the Loop of Self-Paced Online Course Learning Design

Open access
Yan, Hongxin, Lin, Fuhua, Kinshuk·2021·International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Abstract

Online education is growing because of its benefits and advantages that students enjoy. Educational technologies (e.g., learning analytics, student modelling, and intelligent tutoring systems) bring great potential to online education. Many online courses, particularly in self-paced online learning (SPOL), face some inherent barriers such as learning awareness and academic intervention. These barriers can affect the academic performance of online learners. Recently, learning analytics has been shown to have great potential in removing these barriers. However, it is challenging to achieve the full potential of learning analytics with the traditional online course learning design model. Thus, focusing on SPOL, this study proposes that learning analytics should be included in the course learning design loop to ensure data collection and pedagogical connection. We propose a novel learning design-analytics model in which course learning design and learning analytics can support each other to increase learning success. Based on the proposed model, a set of online course design strategies are recommended for online educators who wish to use learning analytics to mitigate the learning barriers in SPOL. These strategies and technologies are inspired by Jim Greer’s work on student modelling. By following these recommended design strategies, a computer science course is used as an example to show our initial practices of including learning analytics in the course learning design loop. Finally, future work on how to develop and evaluate learning analytics enabled learning systems is outlined.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40593-020-00225-z

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bassen, J., Howley, I., Fast, E., Mitchell, J., & Thille, C. (2018, June). OARS: Exploring instructor analytics for online learning. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale (pp. 1-10).
  2. Karavirta, V., & Shaffer, C. A. (2013, July). JSAV: The JavaScript algorithm visualization library. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education (pp. 159-164).
  3. Lin, F. (2020). Adaptive quiz generation using Thompson sampling, Third Workshop Eliciting Adaptive Sequences for Learning (WASL 2020), co-located with AIED 2020.
  4. Rezaie, M., & Golshan, M. (2015). Computer adaptive test (CAT): Advantages and limitations. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 2(5), 128-137.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, H., Lin, F., & Kinshuk
Affiliations
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • Athabasca University (CA)
Corresponding author
Yan, Hongxin
Venue
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
878-895
ISSN
1560-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3112128060
Cited by
25
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Eastern Finland (UEF) including Kuopio University Hospital
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
learning analytics, self-paced online learning, barriers to learning, student modeling, intelligent tutoring systems, learning awareness, academic intervention, computer science education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review