Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Choice reaction performance following an error

Laming, Donald·1979·Acta Psychologica
DOI 10.1016/0001-6918(79)90026-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0001-6918(79)90026-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Audley, 1973, Some observations on theories of choice reaction time: tutorial review, 509
  2. Berger, 1886, Uber den Einfluss der Reizstärke auf die Dauer einfacher psychischer Vorgänge mit besonderer Rücksicht auf Lichtreize, Philosophische Studien, 3, 38
  3. Bertelson, 1961, Sequential redundancy and speed in a serial two-choice responding task, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 90, 10.1080/17470216108416478 · DOI
  4. Bertelson, 1967, The time course of preparation, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 272, 10.1080/14640746708400102 · DOI
  5. Bertelson, 1963, Blockings in prolonged serial responding, Ergonomics, 6, 109, 10.1080/00140136308930682 · DOI
  6. Burns, 1971, Error-induced inhibition in a serial reaction time task, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 141, 10.1037/h0031335 · DOI
  7. Cattell, 1886, The influence of the intensity of the stimulus on the length of the reaction time, Brain, 8, 512, 10.1093/brain/8.4.512 · DOI
  8. Chocholle, 1940, Variation des temps de réaction auditifs en fonction de l'intensité à diverses fréquences, L'Année Psychologique, 41, 65, 10.3406/psy.1940.5877 · DOI
  9. Edwards, 1965, Optimal strategies for seeking information: models for statistics, choice reaction times, and human information processing, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 2, 312, 10.1016/0022-2496(65)90007-6 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Egeth, 1967, On the nature of errors in a choice reaction task, Psychonomic Science, 8, 345, 10.3758/BF03331694 · DOI
  11. Estes, 1966, Reaction time in relation to display size and correctness of response in forced-choice visual signal detection, Perception and Psychophysics, 1, 369, 10.3758/BF03215808 · DOI
  12. Falmagne, 1965, Stochastic models for choice reaction time with applications to experimental results, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 2, 77, 10.1016/0022-2496(65)90018-0 · DOI
  13. Fitts, 1966, Cognitive aspects of information processing: III set for speed versus accuracy, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 849, 10.1037/h0023232 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Granjon, 1977, Effect of the length of the runs of repetitions on the simple RT-ISI relationship, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 283, 10.1080/14640747708400604 · DOI
  15. Hick, 1952, On the rate of gain of information, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11, 10.1080/17470215208416600 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Laming, 1969, Subjective probability in choice-reaction experiments, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 81, 10.1016/0022-2496(69)90030-3 · DOI
  17. Laming, 1979, A comparison of two random-walk models for two choice reaction time, Acta Psychologica, 10.1016/0001-6918(79)90001-5 · DOI
  18. Laming, 1979, Autocorrelation of choice reaction times, Acta Psychologica, 10.1016/0001-6918(79)90032-5 · DOI
  19. Link, 1975, The relative judgement theory of two choice response time, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12, 114, 10.1016/0022-2496(75)90053-X · DOI · Paper page
  20. Pike, 1968, Latency and relative frequency of response in psychophysical discrimination, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 21, 161, 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1968.tb00407.x · DOI
  21. Rabbitt, 1966, Errors and error corrections in choice-response tasks, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264, 10.1037/h0022853 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Rabbitt, 1968, Three kinds of error-signalling responses in a serial choice task, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 179, 10.1080/14640746808400146 · DOI
  23. Rabbitt, 1977, What does a man do after he makes an error? An analysis of response programming, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 727, 10.1080/14640747708400645 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Rabbitt, 1970, An elementary preliminary taxonomy for some errors in laboratory choice RT tasks, Acta Psychologica, 33, 56, 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90122-8 · DOI
  25. Snodgrass, 1967, Some experiments on simple and choice reaction time, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 1, 10.1037/h0021280 · DOI
  26. Stone, 1960, Models for choice-reaction time, Psychometrika, 25, 251, 10.1007/BF02289729 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Swensson, 1972, The elusive tradeoff: speed vs accuracy in visual discrimination tasks, Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 16, 10.3758/BF03212837 · DOI
  28. Thomas, 1975, A note on the sequential probability ratio test, Psychometrika, 40, 107, 10.1007/BF02291482 · DOI
  29. Wald, 1948, Optimum character of the sequential probability ratio test, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 19, 326, 10.1214/aoms/1177730197 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Welford, 1967. Please supply full reference. · DOI
  31. Woodrow, 1930, The reproduction of temporal intervals, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 473, 10.1037/h0070462 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Laming, D.
Venue
Acta Psychologica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1979
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
199-224
ISSN
0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0001-6918(79)90026-x
OpenAlex
W2023435518
Cited by
261
References
1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.