Cited by 75Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Diminished neural responses predict enhanced intrinsic motivation and sensitivity to external incentive

Open access
Marsden, Karen E., Ma, Wei Ji, Deci, Edward L., Ryan, Richard M., Chiu, Pearl H.·2015·Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

The duration and quality of human performance depend on both intrinsic motivation and external incentives. However, little is known about the neuroscientific basis of this interplay between internal and external motivators. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the neural substrates of intrinsic motivation, operationalized as the free-choice time spent on a task when this was not required, and tested the neural and behavioral effects of external reward on intrinsic motivation. We found that increased duration of free-choice time was predicted by generally diminished neural responses in regions associated with cognitive and affective regulation. By comparison, the possibility of additional reward improved task accuracy, and specifically increased neural and behavioral responses following errors. Those individuals with the smallest neural responses associated with intrinsic motivation exhibited the greatest error-related neural enhancement under the external contingency of possible reward. Together, these data suggest that human performance is guided by a "tonic" and "phasic" relationship between the neural substrates of intrinsic motivation (tonic) and the impact of external incentives (phasic).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13415-014-0324-5

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marsden, K. E., Ma, W. J., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Chiu, P. H.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • Carilion Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Chiu, Pearl H.
Venue
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2014-10-28
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
276-286
ISSN
  • 1530-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-135X
OpenAlex
W2008633747
Cited by
75
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (MH091872)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH082998, R01MH091872, K02MH082998, MH 074807, MH086811, R01MH087692, K01MH086811, R01MH074807)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
intrinsic motivation, extrinsic rewards, task accuracy
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Oxygen, Predictive Value of Tests, Problem Solving, Reaction Time, Reward, Linear Models, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review