Cited by 154Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMotor Control and AdaptationVisual perception and processing mechanisms

S–R compatibility and response selection

Eimer, Martin, Hommel, Bernhard, Prinz, Wolfgang·1995·Acta Psychologica

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00022-m

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Imitative compatibility effects are attributed to automatic activation of the stimulus-compatible motor representation.

    “Like many other forms of SRC in which participants respond to static symbolic stimuli (De Jong et al., 1994; Eimer et al., 1995), imitative compatibility effects are attributed to automatic activation of the stimulus-compatible motor representation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eimer, M., Hommel, B., & Prinz, W.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Hommel, Bernhard
Venue
Acta Psychologica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-11
Volume
90
Issue
1-3
Pages
301-313
ISSN
0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099505138
Cited by
154
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
response selection, geospatial data, response priming, reaction time, event-related potentials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review