Cited by 181Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorFace Recognition and PerceptionAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Adult preferences for infantile facial features: an ethological approach

Sternglanz, Sarah Hall, Gray, James L., Murakami, Melvin·1977·Animal Behaviour

Abstract

In 1943 Konrad Lorenz postulated that certain infantile cues served as releasers for caretaking behaviour in human adults. This study is an attempt to confirm this hypothesis and to identify relevant cues. The stimuli studied were variations in facial features, and the responses were ratings of the attractiveness of the resultant infant faces. Parametric variations of eye height, eye width, eye height and width, iris size, and vertical variations in feature position (all presented in full-face drawings) were tested for their effect on the ratings, and highly significant preferences for particular stimuli were found. In general these preferences are consistent across a wide variety of environmental factors such as social class and experience with children. These findings are consistent with an ethological interpretation of the data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0003-3472(77)90072-0

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 9 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sternglanz, S. H., Gray, J. L., & Murakami, M.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
Venue
Animal Behaviour
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1977-02
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
108-115
ISSN
0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978701032
Cited by
180
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
facial attractiveness, Konrad Lorenz, ethology, eye height, eye width, social class
MeSH terms
Adult, Cues, Facial Expression, Humans, Infant, Interpersonal Relations, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review