Cited by 210Sleep and related disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Knowledge and practice of sleep hygiene techniques in insomniacs and good sleepers

Lacks, Patricia, Rotert, Monique·1986·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0005-7967(86)90197-x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lacks, P., & Rotert, M.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Lacks, Patricia
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
365-368
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966707645
Cited by
209
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
sleep hygiene, insomnia, sleep onset insomnia, sleep maintenance insomnia, sleep medication, alcohol effects on sleep, exercise and sleep
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Behavior Therapy, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review