The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of human activity on adelie penguin Pygoscelis adeliae breeding success
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) [26,27,28,29,30]; African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) [31,32,33], and little penguins [34,35,36,37] have consistently shown, at various breeding sites, that human disturbances such as human approach and unregulated tourism (i.e., visitor numbers, noise, behaviour and interactions with penguins were uncontrolled) increase heart rates and avoid”
From Effect of Covering a Visitor Viewing Area Window on the Behaviour of Zoo-Housed Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor) (2020) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“For example, Adelie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) have been found to have reduced breeding success as a result of repeated human approaches and nest checks [3].”
From Effects of Regulating Visitor Viewing Proximity and the Intensity of Visitor Behaviour on Little Penguin (Eudyptula minor) Behaviour and Welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [3]
Citations
Cites
How Many Subjects?: Statistical Power Analysis in Research
KRAEMER, H. C., & Blasey, C. M. (2016) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483398761 · Cited by 935
Antarctic ecosystems: ecological change and conservation
Kerry, K. R., & Hempel, G. (1990) · Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut) · Cited by 477
(1975) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02270-0 · Cited by 204
Influence of Food Distribution and Human Disturbance on the Reproductive Success of Herring Gulls
Hunt, G. L. (1972) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1935417 · Cited by 203
Breeding biology of the Adélie penguin
Ainley, D. G., LeResche, R. E., & Sladen, W. J. L. (1983) · University of California Press eBooks · Cited by 185
Blair, E., Kraemer, H. C., & Thiemann, S. (1989) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172615 · Cited by 159
Effects of Human Disturbance on Reproductive Success in the Black Skimmer
Safina, C., & Burger, J. (1983) · Ornithological Applications · doi:10.2307/1367250 · Cited by 140
Behavior and Nesting Success Relative to Nest Location in Adelie Penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae)
Tenaza, R. R. (1971) · Ornithological Applications · doi:10.2307/1366127 · Cited by 131
Human interference and gull predation in cormorant colonies
Kury, C. R., & Gochfeld, M. (1975) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(75)90076-2 · Cited by 117
Llano, G. A. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 109
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Ainley, 1972, Chick raising ability in adelie penguins, Auk, 89, 559
- Anderson, 1988, Dose-response relationship between human disturbance and brown pelican breeding success, Wild. Soc. Bull., 16, 339
- Ellison, 1978, Effects of human disturbance on breeding of double-crested cormorants, Auk, 95, 510
- Maher, 1966, Predation impact on penguins, Nat. Hist., 75, 42
- Muller-Schwarze, 1984, Possible impact on penguin populations in the Antarctic Peninsula area, Antarct. J. US., 19, 158
- Ollason, 1980, Nest failure in the fulmar: the effect of observers, J. Field Ornithol., 51, 39
- Stonehouse, 1965, Too many tourists in Antarctica?, Animals, 7, 450
- Woehler, 1990, Increased numbers of adelie penguins at the Windmill Islands, ANARE News, 61, 8
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Threats to seabirds: A global assessment
Dias, M. P., Martin, R., Pearmain, E. J., Burfield, I. J., Small, C., Phillips, R. A., Yates, O., Lascelles, B., Borboroglu, P. G., & Croxall, J. P. (2019) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.033 · Cited by 884
Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation
Tuia, D., Kellenberger, B., Beery, S., Costelloe, B. R., Zuffi, S., Risse, B., Mathis, A., Mathis, M. W., van Langevelde, F., Burghardt, T., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-27980-y · Cited by 740
Bejder, L., Samuels, A., Whitehead, H., Finn, H. C., & Allen, S. J. (2009) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps07979 · Cited by 489
Human disturbance: people as predation‐free predators?
Beale, C. M., & Monaghan, P. (2004) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00900.x · Cited by 449
A review of human disturbance effects on nesting colonial waterbirds
Carney, K. M., & Sydeman, W. J. (1999) · Waterbirds: The International Journal of Waterbird Biology · doi:10.2307/1521995 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Giese, M.
- Affiliations
- La Trobe University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Giese, Melissa
- Venue
- Biological Conservation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-164
- ISSN
- 0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156933162
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Antarctic Division
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Polar Research and Ecology
- Keywords
- Pygoscelis adeliae, breeding success, hatching success, chick survival, human disturbance, colony size, Antarctica, seabird colonies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
