Cited by 171Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSchizophrenia research and treatment

Early pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of oral d-amphetamine in normal subjects

Angrist, Burt, Corwin, June, Bartlik, Barbara, Cooper, Thomas·1987·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Seven normal subjects received 0.25 mg/kg D-amphetamine orally, both after an overnight fast and again after a standard breakfast. Plasma levels, subjective and cardiovascular effects, and observer-rated activation were assessed hourly for 5 hr. Food did not affect amphetamine levels. Plasma levels peaked at 2-3 hr. Maximum cardiovascular effects generally occurred at 1 hr, whereas maximum behavioral and subjective effects occurred at 2 hr. Subjective and behavioral effects declined thereafter, in spite of substantial amphetamine levels. A separate group of 8 subjects received 0.5 mg/kg D-amphetamine orally. Plasma levels, subjective and cardiovascular effects, and activation ratings were assessed hourly for 4 hr. Maximum plasma levels were approximately twice those seen in the first group. In this case, plasma levels peaked at 3-4 hr; blood pressure and subjective and behavioral effects were all maximal at 2-3 hr and were declining by 4 hr, in spite of stable or rising plasma levels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-3223(87)90070-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The selected 90-minute wait period allowed for the therapeutic effects of amphetamine-dextroamphetamine to occur before and throughout tasks.

    “The selected 90-minute wait period for this study allowed for the therapeutic effects of amphetamine–dextroamphetamine to occur before and throughout tasks (Angrist et al., 1987).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Angrist, B., Corwin, J., Bartlik, B., & Cooper, T.
Affiliations
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Corresponding author
Angrist, Burt
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-11
Volume
22
Issue
11
Pages
1357-1368
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005947884
Cited by
171
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
d-amphetamine, oral administration, pharmacokinetics, plasma drug concentration, food effect on absorption, cardiovascular effects, subjective effects, behavioral activation, dose-response relationship, stimulants
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Arousal, Dextroamphetamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review