The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An introduction to probability theory and its applications
(1958) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(58)90688-4 · Cited by 29,269
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984
Self-citationBelief in the law of small numbers.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031322 · Cited by 3,246
Self-citationThe statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review.
Cohen, J. (1962) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0045186 · Cited by 1,824
Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment
Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1971) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(71)90033-x · Cited by 1,819
Conservatism in human information processing
Edwards, W. (1982) · Judgment under Uncertainty · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809477.026 · Cited by 1,004
Man as an intuitive statistician.
Peterson, C. R., & Beach, L. R. (1967) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0024722 · Cited by 963
(1964) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-12392-6 · Cited by 735
Formal representation of human judgment
Kleinmuntz, B., & Cattell, R. B. (1968) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 683
Melton, A. W. (1964) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · Cited by 501
Cited by
Items 101–109 of 109
The nudging effect of AIGC labeling on users’ perceptions of automated news: evidence from EEG
Liu, Y., Wang, S., & Yu, G. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1277829 · Cited by 32
What Makes Everyday Scientific Reasoning So Challenging?
(2017) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2016.11.006 · Cited by 29
Impulsivity influences betting under stress in laboratory gambling
Canale, N., Rubaltelli, E., Vieno, A., Pittarello, A., & Billieux, J. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-10745-9 · Cited by 26
Case Mis‐Conceptualization in Psychological Treatment: An Enduring Clinical Problem
Ridley, C. R., Jeffrey, C. E., & Roberson, R. B. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22354 · Cited by 25
Zhou, Z., Oguz, O. S., Leibold, M., & Buss, M. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2020.2992981 · Cited by 18
Typecast: A Routine Mental Shortcut Causes Party Stereotyping
Ahler, D. J., & Sood, G. (2023) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-022-09780-8 · Cited by 14
Ou, C., Buschek, D., Mayer, S., & Butz, A. (2022) · Mensch und Computer 2022 · doi:10.1145/3543758.3543761 · Cited by 7
Selection Neglect and Political Beliefs
Brundage, M., Little, A. T., & You, S. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/p49at · Cited by 7
Aubert, C., Raineau, Y., & Raynal, M. (2026) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbaf065
Metadata
- Authors
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.
- Venue
- Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1972-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 430-454
- ISSN
- 0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016377072
- Cited by
- 4,851
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 19.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.