Cited by 14Social and Intergroup PsychologyDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsElectoral Systems and Political Participation

Typecast: A Routine Mental Shortcut Causes Party Stereotyping

Open access
Ahler, Douglas J., Sood, Gaurav·2023·Political Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11109-022-09780-8

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Through a representativeness heuristic, we infer that the most extreme positions of some members of a group are the group's most common traits.

    “Through a representativeness heuristic, we infer that the most extreme positions of some members of a group are, in fact, the group's most common traits (Ahler & Sood, 2023).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahler, D. J., & Sood, G.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Ahler, Douglas J.
Venue
Political Behavior
Published
2022-02-18
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
1581-1607
ISSN
  • 0190-9320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6687
OpenAlex
W4226483070
Cited by
14
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Political Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
representativeness heuristic, conjunction fallacy, representativeness bias, political polarization, cognitive load, numeracy, cognitive shortcuts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review