CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 55Social and Intergroup PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMemory Processes and Influences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How attitudes guide memory-based judgments: A two-process model

Klauer, Karl Christoph, Stern, Elsbeth·1992·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
DOI 10.1016/0022-1031(92)90038-l
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-1031(92)90038-l

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Bargh, 1986, Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 869, 10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.869 · DOI
  2. Borkenau, 1987, Ein Versuch der Trennung deskriptiver und evaluativer Bedutungskomponenten in Eigenschafts-beschreibenden Begriffen [An attempted separation of descriptive and evaluative components in trait concepts], Archiv für Psychologie, 139, 189
  3. Devine, 1989, Stereotypes and prejudice: their automatic and controlled components, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5, 10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Dovidio, 1986, Racial stereotypes: The contents of their cognitive representations, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 22, 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90039-9 · DOI
  5. Erdley, 1988, Cognitive and affective components of automatic priming effects, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 741, 10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.741 · DOI
  6. Fazio, 1982, Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 339, 10.1016/0022-1031(82)90058-0 · DOI
  7. Fazio, 1983, Toward a process model of the attitude-behavior relation: Accessing one's attitude upon mere observation of the attitude object, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 723, 10.1037/0022-3514.44.4.723 · DOI
  8. Fazio, 1986, On the automatic activation of attitudes, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229, 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Fazio, 1986, Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.505 · DOI
  10. Felipe, 1970, Evaluative vs. descriptive consistency in trait inferences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 627, 10.1037/h0030090 · DOI
  11. Heathcote, 1988, Screen control and timing routines for the IBM microcomputer family using a high-level-language, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 20, 289, 10.3758/BF03203845 · DOI
  12. Higgins, 1977, Category accessibility and impression formation, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141, 10.1016/S0022-1031(77)80007-3 · DOI
  13. Houston, 1989, Biased processing as a function of attitude accessibility: Making objective judgments subjectively, Social Cognition, 7, 51, 10.1521/soco.1989.7.1.51 · DOI
  14. Klauer, 1988, Die Consider-the-opposite Strategie für Korrektur und Analyse von Halo-Fehlern [The consider-the-opposite strategy for correcting and analysing halo errors], Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 35, 597
  15. Klauer, 1989, Hinweise für die automatische Auswertung affektiver Konsistenz [Evidence for the automatic extraction of affective consistency], Psychologische Beiträge
  16. Lord, 1984, Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1231, 10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1231 · DOI
  17. Lord, 1979, Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Marcel, 1983, Conscious and unconscious perception, Cognitive Psychology, 15, 197, 10.1016/0010-0285(83)90009-9 · DOI
  19. Millar, 1986, Thought-induced attitude change: The effects of schema structure and commitment, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 259, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.259 · DOI
  20. Neely, 1989, Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Memory, Learning, and Cognition, 15, 1003, 10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1003 · DOI
  21. Nisbett, 1977, The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 250, 10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Peabody, 1967, Trait inferences: evaluative and descriptive aspects, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph, 2, 1, 10.1037/h0025230 · DOI
  23. Perdue, 1990, Us and them: Social categorization and the process of intergroup bias, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 475, 10.1037/0022-3514.59.3.475 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Sherman, 1989, Social cognition, Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 281, 10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.001433 · DOI
  25. Shiffrin, 1977, Controlled and automatic human information processing. II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory, Psychological Review, 84, 127, 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Tesser, 1978, Self-generated attitude change, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 289, 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60010-6 · DOI
  27. Tesser, 1977, Cognitive schemas and thought as determinants of attitude change, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 340, 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90004-X · DOI
  28. Wetzel, 1981, The halo effect revisited: Forewarned is not forearmed, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 427, 10.1016/0022-1031(81)90049-4 · DOI
  29. Zajonc, 1980, Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences, American Psychologist, 35, 151, 10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Zillig, 1928, Einstellung und Aussage [Attitude and statement], Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 106, 58

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 55

Metadata

Authors
Klauer, K. C., & Stern, E.
Affiliations
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-03
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
186-206
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0022-1031(92)90038-l
OpenAlex
W2050355264
Cited by
55
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
two-process model, trait ratings, time pressure, affective connotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review