Cited by 2,584Social and Intergroup PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and TestingBehavioral Health and Interventions

On the automatic activation of attitudes.

Fazio, Russell H., Sanbonmatsu, David M., Powell, Martha C., Kardes, Frank R.·1986·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

We hypothesized that attitudes characterized by a strong association between the attitude object and an evaluation of that object are capable of being activated from memory automatically upon mere presentation of the attitude object. We used a priming procedure to examine the extent to which the mere presentation of an attitude object would facilitate the latency with which subjects could indicate whether a subsequently presented target adjective had a positive or a negative connotation. Across three experiments, facilitation was observed on trials involving evaluatively congruent primes (attitude objects) and targets, provided that the attitude object possessed a strong evaluative association. In Experiments 1 and 2, preexperimentally strong and weak associations were identified via a measurement procedure. In Experiment 3, the strength of the object-evaluation association was manipulated. The results indicated that attitudes can be automatically activated and that the strength of the object-evaluation association determines the likelihood of such automatic activation. The implications of these findings for a variety of issues regarding attitudes--including their functional value, stability, effects on later behavior, and measurement--are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Like physiological measures, the validity of most indirect measures has been established via stimuli of known valence from self-report studies, creating the same inferential paradox described for physiological measures.

    “like physiological measures, the validity of most indirect measures has been established via stimuli of known va- lence, and this knowledge came from studies using self-report measures (e.g., Fazio et al. 1986, Greenwald et al. 1998, Payne et al. 2005).This issue creates the same inferential paradox described for physiological measures.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1986
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
229-238
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2024168339
Cited by
2,584
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 109 · 2015: 104 · 2014: 116 · 2013: 114 · 2012: 134
FWCI
63.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH 38832)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
attitude strength, priming, attitude measurement, attitude stability, attitude functions
MeSH terms
Arousal, Attitude, Consciousness, Humans, Memory, Mental Recall, Set, Psychology, Word Association Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review