Cited by 138Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and RehabilitationNoise Effects and Management

A psychometric study of complaints in chronic tinnitus

Hiller, Wolfgang, Goebel, Gerhard·1992·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Dimensions of psychological complaints due to chronic and disabling tinnitus were investigated by means of the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), administered to a sample of 138 tinnitus sufferers who had been admitted to a psychosomatic hospital. Factor analysis revealed that tinnitus-related patterns of emotional and cognitive distress, intrusiveness, auditory perceptual difficulties, sleep disturbances, and somatic complaints can be differentiated. Cognitive distortions and inappropriate attitudes towards the tinnitus and it's personal consequences were found to be highly intercorrelated forming a subgroup within a broader and more general distress factor. The stability of the factor solution obtained was examined by systematically varying the number of factors to be extracted. Based on the results of this method, scales are proposed for the questionnaire which can be used in clinical and scientific work to specifically assess major areas of tinnitus-related distress and their degree of severity. Implications for a further evaluation of the instrument are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-3999(92)90070-i

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hiller, W., & Goebel, G.
Affiliations
Schön Klinik Roseneck (DE)
Corresponding author
Goebel, Gerhard
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-05
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
337-348
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123434566
Cited by
138
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
Keywords
chronic tinnitus, psychological distress, Tinnitus Questionnaire, emotional distress, cognitive distortions, sleep disorders, somatic symptoms, psychometric validation, factor structure
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Risk Factors, Sick Role, Tinnitus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review