The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions
Abstract
Generally positive correlations between different ability tests provide the evidence for a factor of "general intelligence" or Spearman's g. Though a possible neural substrate for g is suggested by executive impairments following frontal lobe lesions, preserved IQs in some frontal patients have been taken as strong evidence against this interpretation. We show that such results depend on how g is measured. Patients with superior IQs on the most clinically popular test--the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale--show impairments of 20-60 points on conventionally measured fluid intelligence or novel problem solving. On psychometric grounds, it is fluid intelligence that is most closely related to Spearman's g. The data suggest that g may in large part be a reflection of frontal functions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus it would seem that in the same way as there is growing evidence for the fractionation of executive cognitive functions (see, e.g., Burgess, 1997; Burgess & Shallice, 1994, 1996a, 1996c; Duncan et al., 1995; Goldstein et al., 1993), the syndrome may fractionate also at the behavioral level.”
From The ecological validity of tests of executive function (1998) · cites this paper as Duncan et al., 1995
In the citing paper
“It would appear that at least some conventional IQ tests do not tap many aspects of the cognitive and everyday problems shown by dysexecutive patients (see Burgess, 1997; Duncan et al., 1995, for further discussion of the relationship between IQ and executive function).”
From The ecological validity of tests of executive function (1998) · cites this paper as Duncan et al., 1995
Citations
Cites
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0626 · Cited by 4,726
Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986) · Consciousness and Self-Regulation · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1 · Cited by 4,455
(1998) · Cited by 4,172
Human cognitive abilities a survey of factor-analytic studies
Carroll, J. B. (2004) · Cited by 3,395
Higher cortical functions in man
Lurii︠a︡, A. R., Teuber, H., Pribram, K. H., & Haigh, B. (1966) · Basic Books · Cited by 2,858
DEFICITS IN STRATEGY APPLICATION FOLLOWING FRONTAL LOBE DAMAGE IN MAN
SHALLICE, T., & BURGESS, P. W. (1991) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/114.2.727 · Cited by 2,017
Self-citationWechsler Adult Intelligence Scale
(2007) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412952644.n478 · Cited by 2,017
Abilities: Their Structure, Growth, and Action
Jensen, A. R., & Cattell, R. B. (1974) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422024 · Cited by 1,881
Headstrom, B. R. (1928) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.68.1750.38-a · Cited by 1,819
Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?!
Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0160-2896(05)80012-1 · Cited by 1,810
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Raichle, 1991, Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 17, 21
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,481
Executive functions and developmental psychopathology.
Pennington, B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01380.x · Cited by 3,150
Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach.
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309 · Cited by 3,078
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196323 · Cited by 2,229
Executive Function and the Frontal Lobes: A Meta-Analytic Review
Alvarez, J. A., & Emory, E. (2006) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-006-9002-x · Cited by 1,981
Metadata
- Authors
- Duncan, J., Burgess, P., & Emslie, H.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- ORCID
- Burgess, Paul
- Venue
- Neuropsychologia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 261-268
- ISSN
- 0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973477197
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 14.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Air Force
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- fluid intelligence, general intelligence, Spearman's g, frontal lobe lesions, executive function, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, IQ, novel problem solving, neuropsychological assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Diseases, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Intelligence, Learning, Male, Memory Disorders, Middle Aged, Wechsler Scales
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
