The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Many students recognise that hiding AI use is academically dishonest but may still choose non-declaration due to perceived pressures or potential academic benefit (Beck and Ajzen 1991).”
From Addressing student non-compliance in AI use declarations: implications for academic integrity and assessment in higher education (2025) · cites this paper as Beck and Ajzen 1991
In the citing paper
“This challenges TPB's emphasis on individual decision-making (Ajzen 1991; Beck and Ajzen 1991) by emphasising the collective nature of behaviour, where the desire to conform to peer norms can override ethical considerations.”
From Addressing student non-compliance in AI use declarations: implications for academic integrity and assessment in higher education (2025) · cites this paper as Beck and Ajzen 1991
In the citing paper
“Research has demonstrated that both descriptive and personal injunctive norms exert an independent influence on intentions over and above the influence of other TPB variables (e.g., Beck & Ajzen, 1991;Conner & McMillan, 1999;Manstead, 2000;Parker et al., 1995;Sheeran & Orbell, 1999).”
From Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and in-group norms (2009) · cites this paper as Beck & Ajzen, 1991
In the citing paper
“TPB was extended to dishonest behavior specifically almost as soon as it was formulated, with early work showing it could predict cheating, lying, and shoplifting from the same three components (Beck & Ajzen, 1991;Dewanti et al., 2020;Harding et al., 2007).”
From Convenience Amid Crisis: Explaining Generative AI Misuse and Compliance Intention Among Myanmar University Students (2026) · cites this paper as Beck & Ajzen, 1991
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Self-citation(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Self-citation(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
Self-citationFrom Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057
Self-citationTelling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611
Self-citation(1988) · Cited by 6,825
Self-citationPrediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4 · Cited by 5,718
Self-citationMadison, P., & Mischel, W. (1968) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421067 · Cited by 4,395
Action control : from cognition to behavior
Kühl, J., & Beckmann, J. (1985) · Cited by 3,444
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Fishbein, 1981, Attitudes and voting behaviour: An application of the theory of reasoned action, Vol. 1, 253
- Hartshorne, 1928, Vol. 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Self-citationEfficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54 · Cited by 3,480
Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research
Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x · Cited by 3,344
How Habit Limits the Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance1
Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G., & Cheung, C. M. K. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148817 · Cited by 2,450
Metadata
- Authors
- Beck, L., & Ajzen, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Corresponding author
- Beck, Lisa
- ORCID
- Ajzen, Icek
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Personality
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-09
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 285-301
- ISSN
- 0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066424242
- Cited by
- 1,325
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 5.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Keywords
- dishonest behavior, theory of planned behavior, intention-behavior relationship, cheating, shoplifting, lying, moral obligation, subjective norms, behavioral control, attitudes, university students, self-report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
