Ultrastructural patterns of RNA synthesis during early embryogenesis of drosophila melanogaster
Abstract
Chromatin was obtained from Drosophila melanogaster during early embryogenesis and examined by transmission electron microscopy. Nuclear contents spread at progressive stages of syncytial development show a low level of only non-nuclear template activity, and very few RNP fibril gradients extending over 2mum in length are observed. At the cellular blastoderm stage, newly activated nucleolar genes appear during the early portion of the first true cell cycle. Variation in the lengths of incomplete rRNP gradients indicates that the activation of each rRNA gene is independently controlled. All rRNA loci, whether having complete or incomplete gradients, exhibit high densities of nascent transcripts per unit length, suggesting that the rate of chromatin transcription, rather than the RNA polymarase I pool size, limits rRNA synthesis on individual genes. No more than half the rRNA genes are derepressed at this stage indicating that total rRNA synthesis is regulated by the number of genes activated. Non-nucleolar RNP fibril gradients covering up to 8 mum of genome are also first observed at the cellular blastoderm stage. Most of these gradients are differentiated from the short gradient first seen during syncytial growth by a lower density of transcribing RNA polymerases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only a part of rDNA units is transcriptionally active at any time, while the rest, or even the majority of rDNA repeats, are in a repressed state.
“Numerous genetic, microscopic and biochemical studies have demonstrated that only a part of rDNA units is transcriptionally active at any time, while the rest, or even the majority of rDNA repeats, are in a repressed state (6–14).”
From Impaired function of rDNA transcription initiation machinery leads to derepression of ribosomal genes with insertions of R2 retrotransposon (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
Cites
Ritossa, F. M., Atwood, K. C., & Spiegelman, S. (1966) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/54.3.819 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Harrison, M. M., Li, X.-Y., Kaplan, T., Botchan, M. R., & Eisen, M. B. (2011) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002266 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Yao, R.-W., Xu, G., Wang, Y., Shan, L., Luan, P.-F., Wang, Y., Wu, M., Yang, L.-Z., Xing, Y.-H., Yang, L., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.08.014 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
Unmasking Activation of the Zygotic Genome Using Chromosomal Deletions in the Drosophila Embryo
De Renzis, S., Elemento, O., Tavazoie, S., & Wieschaus, E. F. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050117 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Steiner, F. A., Talbert, P. B., Kasinathan, S., Deal, R. B., & Henikoff, S. (2012) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.131748.111 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Jamrich, M., & Miller, O. L. (1984) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02008.x · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationZhou, J., & Eickbush, T. H. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000386 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Repression of interrupted and intact rDNA by the SUMO pathway in drosophila melanogaster
Luo, Y., Fefelova, E., Ninova, M., Chen, Y.-C. A., & Aravin, A. A. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.52416 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Fefelova, E. A., Pleshakova, I. M., Mikhaleva, E. A., Pirogov, S. A., Poltorachenko, V. A., Abramov, Y. A., Romashin, D. D., Shatskikh, A. S., Blokh, R. S., Gvozdev, V. A., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1276 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- McKnight, S. L., & Miller Jr., O. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- ORCID
- McKnight, Steven L.
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1976-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 305-319
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000880684
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 15.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- RNA synthesis, early embryonic development, Drosophila melanogaster, RNA polymerase I, chromatin ultrastructure, nascent RNA
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Blastoderm, Chromatin, Drosophila melanogaster, Genes, Microscopy, Electron, Protein Conformation, Ribonucleoproteins, RNA, RNA, Ribosomal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review