Expression of ribosomal DNA insertions in drosophila melanogaster
Abstract
Approximately half of the ribosomal genes on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster are interrupted by an insertion of type 1. Nuclear RNA from D. melanogaster embryos was transferred to DBM paper and hybridized with cloned type 1 insertion sequences. With a DNA fragment derived specifically from large insertions, transcripts were detected between 5 and 10 kb. These insertion transcripts represent less than one RNA molecule per nucleus, which is more than three orders of magnitude below the concentration of nascent rRNA chains, as determined by kinetics of hybridization. With a DNA fragment derived from the right end of large insertions which is also complementary to short insertions, more discrete RNA bands appeared with sizes between 1 and 8.5 kb, representing altogether about 13 RNA molecules per nucleus. Insertion transcripts large enough to be potential precursors to 28S rRNA represent less than one molecule per nucleus. It was shown by sandwich hybridization that at least some of the insertion transcripts are derived from rDNA. No significant difference was found between insertion transcripts in RNA extracted from ovaries, embryos, larvae, pupae or adult flies. Unless a mechanism other than splicing is involved, ribosomal genes with insertions cannot contribute significantly to the synthesis of 28S rRNA. A cytoplasmic RNA approximately 1 kb long, which is complementary to a short insertion and to ribosomal gene sequences flanking both sides of the insertion, was fo…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
rRNA genes with insertions produce hundreds or thousands of times fewer transcripts than intact rDNAs, though one work observed only a 10-fold difference.
“In fact, it has been known for several decades that rRNA genes with insertions (hereafter, inserted or interrupted rDNAs) produce hundreds or thousands of times fewer transcripts than intact (uninserted) rDNAs (47–49), though in one work only a 10-fold difference was observed (50).”
From Impaired function of rDNA transcription initiation machinery leads to derepression of ribosomal genes with insertions of R2 retrotransposon (2022) · cites this paper as [47]
A substantial number of rDNA units in the D. melanogaster genome contain insertions of R1 and R2 retrotransposons usually causing these units to be expressed at very low levels.
“It has been known for several decades that a substantial number of rDNA units in the D. melanogaster genome contain insertions of R1 and R2 retrotransposons usually causing these units to be expressed at very low levels (47,48,51).”
From Impaired function of rDNA transcription initiation machinery leads to derepression of ribosomal genes with insertions of R2 retrotransposon (2022) · cites this paper as [47]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In vitro splicing of the ribosomal RNA precursor in nuclei of tetrahymena
Zaug, A. J., & Cech, T. R. (1980) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(80)90507-3 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Kidd, S. J., & Glover, D. M. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(81)90428-9 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Jamrich, M., & Miller, O. L. (1984) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02008.x · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Zhou, J., & Eickbush, T. H. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000386 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Repression of interrupted and intact rDNA by the SUMO pathway in drosophila melanogaster
Luo, Y., Fefelova, E., Ninova, M., Chen, Y.-C. A., & Aravin, A. A. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.52416 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Fefelova, E. A., Pleshakova, I. M., Mikhaleva, E. A., Pirogov, S. A., Poltorachenko, V. A., Abramov, Y. A., Romashin, D. D., Shatskikh, A. S., Blokh, R. S., Gvozdev, V. A., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1276 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Raje, H. S., Lieux, M. E., & DiMario, P. J. (2018) · Transcription · doi:10.1080/21541264.2018.1506682 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Long, E. O., & Dawid, I. B.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1979-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1185-1196
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088886801
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 26.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Keywords
- Drosophila melanogaster, X chromosome, ribosomal RNA synthesis, splicing, unspliced RNA, nuclear RNA, embryonic development, ribosomal genes
- MeSH terms
- Animals, DNA, DNA Transposable Elements, Drosophila melanogaster, Genes, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Nucleic Acid Precursors, RNA, Ribosomal, Transcription, Genetic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review