Cited by 29Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlStress Responses and CortisolAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Concordance between anxiety and autonomic nervous system activity in subjects at genetic risk for affective disorder

Zahn, Theodore P., Nurnberger, John I., Berrettini, Wade H., Robinson, Thomas N.·1991·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Correlations between electrodermal and heart rate indices of autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity and measures of state and trait anxiety were examined in 22 high-risk subjects, who had a parent with bipolar affective disorder, and in controls. Relatively consistent and significant correlations between anxiety and ANS "arousal" at rest and under stress were found in high-risk subjects, but not in controls. Relationships between electrodermal laterality and anxiety, and between electrodermal activity and heart rate, were also observed only in the high-risk group. The data suggest a unique concordance between various manifestations of anxiety in high-risk persons which may effectively increase the salience of stressful events and the sensitization to stress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0165-1781(91)90121-5

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rates of physiological-subjective concordance are higher in clinical versus non-clinical samples, high versus low trait anxious undergraduates, children genetically at-risk for psychopathology versus low risk, and individuals with PTSD versus without PTSD.

    “Previous research suggests that rates of physiological-subjective concordance are higher in clinical vs. non-clinical samples (Sallis, Lichstein & McGlynn, 1980), high vs. low trait anxious undergraduates (Calvo & Miguel-Tobal, 1999), children genetically at-risk for psychopathology vs. children at low genetic risk (Zahn, Nurnberger, Berrettini, & Robinson, 1991), and individuals with PTSD”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Zahn, T. P., Nurnberger, J. I., Berrettini, W. H., & Robinson, T. N.
Affiliations
National Institute of Mental Health (US)
Corresponding author
Zahn, Theodore P.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
99-110
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088011734
Cited by
29
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
anxiety, autonomic nervous system activity, genetic risk, bipolar disorder, family history (medicine), electrodermal activity, heart rate, state anxiety, trait anxiety, stress arousal, stress sensitization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Arousal, Autonomic Nervous System, Depressive Disorder, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Personality Tests, Risk Factors, Social Environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review