Cited by 170Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and TestingReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Measuring meaning in life: An examination of three scales

Chamberlain, Kerry, Zika, Sheryl·1988·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0191-8869(88)90157-2

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chamberlain, K., & Zika, S.
Affiliations
Massey University (NZ)
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-01
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
589-596
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050792385
Cited by
170
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
meaning in life, scale validation, factor structure, meaning of life, sense of coherence, multidimensional construct, higher-order factor analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review