CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 359Personality Traits and PsychologyEmotions and Moral BehaviorChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Facets of emotional Expressivity: Three self-report factors and their correlates

Open access
Gross, James J., John, Oliver P.·1995·Personality and Individual Differences
DOI 10.1016/0191-8869(95)00055-b
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Using an explicit model of emotion, we developed the Berkeley Expressivity Questionnaire. This measure of emotional expressivity has three facets: impulse strength, negative expressivity, and positive expressivity. After evaluating its factor structure and psychometric properties, we tested propositions derived from an analysis of display rules. As predicted, women were more expressive than men; Asian-Americans less expressive than other ethnic groups; and Democrats more expressive than Republicans. Expressivity also was related to two mood dimensions and to four of the Big Five personality dimensions. The pattern of findings for the subscales showed convergent and discriminant validity. Positive mood, Extraversion, and Agreeableness were most strongly related to the Positive Expressivity subscale. Negative mood, Neuroticism, and somatic complaints were most strongly related to the Impulse Strength and Negative Expressivity subscales.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0191-8869(95)00055-b

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Cattell, 1966, The scree test for the number of factors, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245, 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Costantini, 1980, Personality and politicians: California party leaders, 1960–1976, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 641, 10.1037/0022-3514.38.4.641 · DOI
  3. Eysenck, 1992, Four ways five factors are not basic, Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667, 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90237-J · DOI
  4. Eysenck, 1992, A reply to Costa and McCrae: P or A and C—the role of theory, Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 867, 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90003-8 · DOI
  5. Friedman, 1991, Nonverbal display of emotion in public and in private: Self-monitoring, personality, and expressive cues, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 766, 10.1037/0022-3514.61.5.766 · DOI
  6. Friedman, 1988, Nonverbal skill, personal charisma, and initial attraction, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 203, 10.1177/0146167288141020 · DOI
  7. Frijda, 1988, The laws of emotion, American Psychologist, 43, 349, 10.1037/0003-066X.43.5.349 · DOI
  8. Gross, 1994, The psychophysiology of crying, Psychophysiology, 31, 460, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb01049.x · DOI
  9. John, 1993, Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self, Journal of Personality, 61, 521, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00781.x · DOI
  10. King, 1990, Conflict over emotional expression: Psychological and physical correlates, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 864, 10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.864 · DOI
  11. Kring, 1994, Individual differences in dispositional expressiveness: Development and validation of the Emotional Expressivity Scale, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 934, 10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.934 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Larsen, 1987, Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review, Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 1, 10.1016/0092-6566(87)90023-7 · DOI
  13. Plutchik, 1980, A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion, Vol. 1, 3
  14. Plutchik, 1990, Emotions and psychotherapy: A psychoevolutionary perspective, Vol. 5, 3
  15. Shields, 1987, Women, men, and the dilemma of emotion, Vol. 7, 229
  16. Wallbott, 1989, Assessing emotion by questionnaire, Vol. 4, 55
  17. Waller, N. G. (in press). Evaluating the structure of personality. In Cloninger, C. R. (Ed.), Personality and psychopathology. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
  18. Watson, 1992, On traits and temperament: General and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the five-factor model, Journal of Personality, 60, 441, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00980.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. Watson, 1985, Toward a consensual structure of mood, Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219, 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Watson, 1983, Development of a questionnaire measure of emotional control, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 27, 299, 10.1016/0022-3999(83)90052-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 359

Metadata

Authors
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
ORCID
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-10
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
555-568
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0191-8869(95)00055-b
OpenAlex
W2069864193
Cited by
359
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 21
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
emotional expressivity, display rules, political affiliation, Big Five personality traits, mood, impulse strength, somatic symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review