Cited by 15Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Vasopressin and cognitive processes: Two event-related potential studies

Naumann, Ewald, Bartussek, Dieter, Kaiser, Walter, Fehm-Wolfsdorf, Gabriele·1991·Peptides

Abstract

Two experiments studied the influence of arginine-vasopressin (AVP) on cognitive processes by means of an electrophysiological measure, the late positive complex (LPC) of the event-related potential. The LPC varies systematically with cognitive processes. The classical oddball paradigm and an incidental memory task (structural encoding of emotional adjectives) were used. The two studies differed only in the dose of AVP (study 1: three time nasal application of 10 IU AVP; study 2: 20 IU). In study 1, AVP intake enhanced memory performance. The LPC elicited by oddball stimuli was not influenced by AVP, neither when compared before and after intake nor when compared to placebo treatment. However, specific influences of AVP on the LPC elicited during the structural encoding task were observed. In both studies, AVP intake resulted in a marked change of the scalp distribution of the P3 component, which is a prominent part of the LPC. Furthermore, subjects treated with the lower dose of AVP showed a more positive P3 component on emotional (negative and positive) adjectives, when compared to neutral ones. The results suggest that vasopressin influences the central nervous processing of the emotional content of stimuli.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0196-9781(91)90223-c

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intranasal vasopressin increased the amplitude of several components of late event-related potentials, in particular P3, which reflects higher cognitive and attention processing.

    “IN-AVP increased the amplitude of several components of the late ERPs, in particular the amplitude of P3, which reflects a higher level of cognitive and attention processing (Born et al. 1986; Fehm-Wolfsdorf et al. 1988; Naumann et al. 1991; Pietrowsky et al. 1989).”

    From A precision medicine approach to oxytocin trials (2017) · cites this paper as Naumann et al. 1991

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naumann, E., Bartussek, D., Kaiser, W., & Fehm-Wolfsdorf, G.
Affiliations
  • Universität Trier (DE)
  • Klinik Bavaria (DE)
Venue
Peptides
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-11
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
1379-1384
ISSN
0196-9781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981343636
Cited by
15
References
39
Citations by year
2019: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Peptides (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
vasopressin, cognitive processes, late positive complex, P300, event-related potentials, oddball paradigm, incidental memory, emotional adjectives, emotional memory, intranasal administration
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adolescent, Adult, Arginine Vasopressin, Cognition, Electroencephalography, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review