Cited by 67Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorSleep and Wakefulness ResearchNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Vasopressin but not oxytocin enhances cortical arousal: an integrative hypothesis on behavioral effects of neurohypophyseal hormones

Fehm-Wolfsdorf, Gabriele, Bachholz, Georg, Born, Jan, Voigt, Karlheinz, Fehm, Horst Lorenz·1988·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Behavioral changes after administration of the neurohypophyseal hormones vasopressin and oxytocin can be observed in animal and man. Several groups attempted to specify these changes in terms of memory or attention processing enhancement for vasopressin and amnesic properties for oxytocin. These interpretations, however, were targets for recent criticism. In a double-blind between-subject comparison with male volunteers receiving arginine-vasopressin (AVP), oxytocin or placebo intranasally prior to the experimental session, we tried to develop an alternative hypothesis on the basis of behavioral and EEG measures. At the beginning of the session subjects had to learn a list of 25 unrelated nouns within five trials. Recall was assessed 1 h later. Neither learning nor long-term recall were affected by peptide treatments. In a second vigilance task subjects had to covertly count eight series of tone pips. Averaged auditory evoked potentials to these tones showed the expected habituation during the course of the task within all three groups. Vasopressin-treated subjects, however, displayed significantly higher amplitudes of the vertex potential as compared to the other treatment groups. AVP effects were most prominent with the longest interstimulus interval. No influences on heart rate or blood pressure were found. Results indicate that vasopressin induces an enhancement of stimulus-related phasic cortical arousal, and that in this respect oxytocin has no effect.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00212844

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intranasal vasopressin increased the amplitude of several components of late event-related potentials, in particular P3, which reflects higher cognitive and attention processing.

    “IN-AVP increased the amplitude of several components of the late ERPs, in particular the amplitude of P3, which reflects a higher level of cognitive and attention processing (Born et al. 1986; Fehm-Wolfsdorf et al. 1988; Naumann et al. 1991; Pietrowsky et al. 1989).”

    From A precision medicine approach to oxytocin trials (2017) · cites this paper as Fehm-Wolfsdorf et al. 1988

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fehm-Wolfsdorf, G., Bachholz, G., Born, J., Voigt, K., & Fehm, H. L.
Affiliations
Universität Ulm (DE)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
1988-04
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
496-500
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2066465114
Cited by
67
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
vasopressin, oxytocin, neurohypophyseal hormones, cortical arousal, vertex potential, auditory evoked potentials, sustained attention, memory, intranasal administration, habituation, interstimulus interval
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Blood Pressure, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Heart Rate, Humans, Learning, Male, Memory, Oxytocin, Vasopressins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review