Cited by 179Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Regional synaptic pathology in Alzheimer's disease

Honer, William G., Dickson, Dennis W., Gleeson, Janet, Davies, Peter·1992·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Synaptic pathology in Alzheimer's disease (AD) may occur diffusely or may have regional predilections. A new antibody called EP10 which detects synaptophysin-like immunoreactivity was used to study synapses in postmortem brain tissue. Four brain regions from cases of AD and controls were studied. Controls with a wide range of ages were used to investigate the possibility of age-related changes in synaptophysin-like immunoreactivity. A significant reduction in the EP10 antigen was observed to occur with age in the control caudate but not in the hippocampus or temporal or occipital cortices. Antigen levels were significantly reduced in the hippocampus (77%) and the temporal cortex (54%) in AD. The expected abnormal pallor of the outer two-thirds of the dentate gyrus molecular layer was observed with immunocytochemistry. In the temporal cortex, the reduction in synaptophysin-like immunoreactivity was inversely correlated with the neurofibrillary tangle count. No such relationship existed in the hippocampus. These results suggest that at least certain components of the synaptic loss in AD occur regionally and are disproportionately large in the hippocampus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0197-4580(92)90111-a

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are studies suggesting a strong correlation between the loss of synaptic markers and the presence of neurofibrillary tangles.

    “Indeed, there are studies suggesting a strong correlation between the loss of synaptic markers and the presence of neurofibrillary tangles (Terry et al., 1991; Honer et al., 1992; Masliah et al., 1992; Wakabayashi et al., 1994; Lue et al., 1996; Samuel et al., 1997; Heffernan et al., 1998).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Honer, W. G., Dickson, D. W., Gleeson, J., & Davies, P.
Affiliations
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Honer, William G.
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-05
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
375-382
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039005734
Cited by
179
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, synaptic pathology, synaptophysin, hippocampus, temporal cortex, caudate nucleus, dentate gyrus molecular layer, neurofibrillary tangles, postmortem brain
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Regression Analysis, Synapses, Immunoblotting, Neurofibrillary Tangles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review