Cited by 95Psychological Testing and AssessmentPsychometric Methodologies and TestingClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Psychological tests and clinical discriminations: Beginning to address the base rate problem

Elwood, Richard W.·1993·Clinical Psychology Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0272-7358(93)90012-b

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of a significant difference alone does not imply that a test can discriminate among subjects with sufficient accuracy for clinical use.

    “Elwood (1993) stated that the presence of a significant difference alone does not imply that the test can discriminate among subjects with sufficient accuracy for clinical use.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elwood, R. W.
Affiliations
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Corresponding author
Elwood, Richard W.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-01
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
409-419
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129384161
Cited by
94
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
base rates, discriminant validity, psychological tests, classification accuracy, clinical evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review