Cited by 39Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The Reliability of Clinical Diagnoses: State of the Art

Kraemer, Helena Chmura·2014·Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Reliability of clinical diagnosis is essential for good clinical decision making as well as productive clinical research. The current review emphasizes the distinction between a disorder and a diagnosis and between validity and reliability of diagnoses, and the relationships that exist between them. What is crucial is that reliable diagnoses are essential to establishing valid diagnoses. The present review discusses the theoretical background underlying the evaluation of diagnoses, possible designs of reliability studies, estimation of the reliability coefficient, the standards for assessment of reliability, and strategies for improving reliability without compromising validity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153739

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kraemer, H. C.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Kraemer, Helena Chmura
Venue
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Published
2014-03-28
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
111-130
ISSN
  • 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-5951
OpenAlex
W2146580987
Cited by
39
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
diagnostic reliability, validity, diagnosis, reliability studies, reliability coefficients, clinical decision-making, psychodiagnosis
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review